Tools & Wizards About Us
jobconstruction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

jobconstruction.com

J.O.B. Design & Construction | General Contractor | Pottstown, PA

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

676 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

248 ms

jobconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jobconstruction.com now to see the best up-to-date Job Construction content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jobconstruction.com

J.O.B. Design & Construction is a design/build firm. We are General Contractors with over 35 years of experience in the construction industry serving Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Visit jobconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jobconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 676 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jobconstruction.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.jobconstruction.com

676 ms

minified.js

68 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

43 ms

polyfill.min.js

58 ms

bootstrap-features.1a99b4a8.bundle.min.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jobconstruction.com, 47% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 39% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.2 kB (58%)

Content Size

567.0 kB

After Optimization

239.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jobconstruction.com main page is 567.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 410.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 311.7 kB

  • Original 410.1 kB
  • After minification 408.3 kB
  • After compression 98.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 311.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 93.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Job Construction needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (27%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Job Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.jobconstruction.com

www.jobconstruction.com

676 ms

minified.js

minified.js

68 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

43 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

58 ms

bootstrap-features.1a99b4a8.bundle.min.js

bootstrap-features.1a99b4a8.bundle.min.js

38 ms

main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js

main.24eb524d.bundle.min.js

30 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

144 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

145 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

145 ms

thunderbolt

thunderbolt

284 ms

wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js

wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js

169 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

272 ms

e7b0cc_f15763aa28c445319c3f551e838e1f78~mv2.png

e7b0cc_f15763aa28c445319c3f551e838e1f78~mv2.png

567 ms

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

462 ms

e7b0cc_02b34059880442b4b8eb89ddc3a31c94~mv2_d_3000_1454_s_2.jpg

e7b0cc_02b34059880442b4b8eb89ddc3a31c94~mv2_d_3000_1454_s_2.jpg

539 ms

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

460 ms

e7b0cc_48d715da3f0543da9fd71c62501d20d9~mv2.png

e7b0cc_48d715da3f0543da9fd71c62501d20d9~mv2.png

517 ms

e7b0cc_7f6eb6697b3b4713a953f13c3e024dd7~mv2.png

e7b0cc_7f6eb6697b3b4713a953f13c3e024dd7~mv2.png

604 ms

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

e7b0cc_2794168550e442718370bb2f269965b4~mv2_d_3572_1324_s_2.png

532 ms

e7b0cc_8efc875cf19f47e6a4216768c1967f5d~mv2.jpg

e7b0cc_8efc875cf19f47e6a4216768c1967f5d~mv2.jpg

652 ms

e7b0cc_22e4b82ff84040f48b8a6d2c12f5bb2c~mv2.jpg

e7b0cc_22e4b82ff84040f48b8a6d2c12f5bb2c~mv2.jpg

962 ms

e7b0cc_abb534360b264d4293f3204f157ea5c2~mv2.jpg

e7b0cc_abb534360b264d4293f3204f157ea5c2~mv2.jpg

694 ms

e7b0cc_48d715da3f0543da9fd71c62501d20d9~mv2.png

e7b0cc_48d715da3f0543da9fd71c62501d20d9~mv2.png

629 ms

8d13be_5d2dc57233f242e19e3947ef5c55b4d8~mv2.png

8d13be_5d2dc57233f242e19e3947ef5c55b4d8~mv2.png

624 ms

8d13be_b420e16115564233855c2619d28e8761~mv2.png

8d13be_b420e16115564233855c2619d28e8761~mv2.png

664 ms

8d13be_bcb2da648cc344db8e43c45986dbaa4a.png

8d13be_bcb2da648cc344db8e43c45986dbaa4a.png

716 ms

8d13be_f158bd26d848468b9838f1b4c5738b2b.png

8d13be_f158bd26d848468b9838f1b4c5738b2b.png

716 ms

8d13be_557572bb4f384197bcdefa3751df15bf.png

8d13be_557572bb4f384197bcdefa3751df15bf.png

727 ms

8d13be_589ba5dbc4a64b0b90f7cab4acc5e52c.png

8d13be_589ba5dbc4a64b0b90f7cab4acc5e52c.png

757 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

159 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

168 ms

thunderbolt

thunderbolt

73 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

50 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

59 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

40 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

Accessibility Review

jobconstruction.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jobconstruction.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jobconstruction.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jobconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jobconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jobconstruction.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Job Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: