Tools & Wizards About Us
jtom.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

jtom.me

Jack Tomaszewski - freelance full-stack software engineer

Page Load Speed

725 ms in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

525 ms

Page Rendered

155 ms

jtom.me screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jtom.me homepage info - get ready to check Jtom best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about jtom.me

Over 15 years of experience in building web and mobile apps. Back-end, front-end, dev ops - name what you need. I'll deliver. Available for hire.

Visit jtom.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Jtom.me page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 680 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jtom.me performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jtom.me

45 ms

jtom.me

145 ms

main.5c2210a3.css

119 ms

main.10647a82.js

137 ms

email-decode.min.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Jtom.me, 21% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (145 ms) belongs to the original domain Jtom.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.8 kB (1%)

Content Size

880.1 kB

After Optimization

874.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jtom.me main page is 880.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 839.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 839.6 kB
  • After minification 839.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jtom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 78 B

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 10.8 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jtom.me has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jtom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jtom.me

jtom.me

45 ms

jtom.me

jtom.me

145 ms

main.5c2210a3.css

main.5c2210a3.css

119 ms

main.10647a82.js

main.10647a82.js

137 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

17 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

avatar.ad31e6ce.png

avatar.ad31e6ce.png

112 ms

home-bg3.ef171b05.jpg

home-bg3.ef171b05.jpg

138 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

29 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

34 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

44 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

45 ms

js

js

74 ms

Accessibility Review

jtom.me accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jtom.me best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

jtom.me SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jtom.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jtom.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jtom.me

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jtom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: