3.5 sec in total
18 ms
3.3 sec
213 ms
Click here to check amazing Junk Removal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about junkremoval.com
Serious offers only.
Visit junkremoval.comWe analyzed Junkremoval.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
junkremoval.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value2,060 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.135
80/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
18 ms
2750 ms
17 ms
43 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Junkremoval.com, 83% (70 requests) were made to Ubbi.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Ubbi.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.8 kB (20%)
853.5 kB
680.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Junkremoval.com main page is 853.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 438.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Junk Removal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Junkremoval.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (91%)
70
6
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Junk Removal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
junkremoval.com
18 ms
2750 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
17 ms
frontend.min.css
43 ms
swiper.min.css
36 ms
post-39.css
34 ms
frontend.min.css
61 ms
global.css
33 ms
post-1936.css
34 ms
post-3912.css
54 ms
post-4476.css
49 ms
post-5294.css
39 ms
css
122 ms
main.min.css
76 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
90 ms
wpbakery.min.css
88 ms
post-type.min.css
92 ms
css-vars.css
90 ms
custom.css
102 ms
media.css
94 ms
mega-menu.css
96 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
98 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
100 ms
style.css
120 ms
elementor-global.min.css
119 ms
the7-icon-box-grid-widget.min.css
123 ms
the7-horizontal-menu-widget.min.css
124 ms
the7-icon-widget.min.css
125 ms
the7-vertical-menu-widget.min.css
126 ms
the7-carousel-widget.min.css
135 ms
the7-carousel-navigation.min.css
138 ms
css
139 ms
fontawesome.min.css
129 ms
solid.min.css
128 ms
brands.min.css
127 ms
jquery.min.js
137 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
138 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
166 ms
js
239 ms
post-6349.css
133 ms
api.js
123 ms
the7-search-form-widget.min.css
133 ms
post-6362.css
128 ms
animations.min.css
194 ms
the7-sticky-effects.min.css
194 ms
rs6.css
187 ms
main.min.js
213 ms
rbtools.min.js
201 ms
rs6.min.js
197 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
200 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
196 ms
post-type.min.js
163 ms
frontend-common.min.js
165 ms
the7-horizontal-menu.min.js
165 ms
the7-vertical-menu.min.js
163 ms
the7-search-form-widget.min.js
158 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
157 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
156 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
156 ms
hooks.min.js
155 ms
i18n.min.js
138 ms
frontend.min.js
137 ms
waypoints.min.js
134 ms
core.min.js
134 ms
frontend.min.js
131 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
132 ms
jquery-sticky.min.js
130 ms
sticky-effects.min.js
130 ms
Color-logo-no-background.png
122 ms
company-logo-dark.svg
118 ms
wave-art-bg-white-down.svg
119 ms
3.png
123 ms
Color-logo-no-background.png
122 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
30 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
99 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff
144 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
160 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
157 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtGOvWDSA.woff
158 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
159 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
157 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
159 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
159 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
28 ms
junkremoval.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
junkremoval.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
junkremoval.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Junkremoval.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Junkremoval.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
junkremoval.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Junk Removal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: