Tools & Wizards About Us
lakeviewgarden.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

lakeviewgarden.in

Lakeview Marriage Garden Indore – Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

473 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

455 ms

lakeviewgarden.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lakeview Garden content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lakeviewgarden.in

Visit lakeviewgarden.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Lakeviewgarden.in page load time and found that the first response time was 473 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lakeviewgarden.in performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lakeviewgarden.in

473 ms

lakeviewgarden.in

1587 ms

style.min.css

234 ms

style.css

463 ms

styles.css

659 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Lakeviewgarden.in, 27% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Lakeviewgarden.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lakeviewgarden.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 93.3 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 99.6 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lakeview Garden images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 143.5 kB
  • After compression 141.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 84.5 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 80.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lakeviewgarden.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (82%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lakeview Garden. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lakeviewgarden.in

lakeviewgarden.in

473 ms

lakeviewgarden.in

lakeviewgarden.in

1587 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

234 ms

style.css

style.css

463 ms

styles.css

styles.css

659 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

663 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

665 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

673 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

685 ms

post-192.css

post-192.css

690 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

877 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

882 ms

jet-sticky-frontend.css

jet-sticky-frontend.css

885 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

896 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

912 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

918 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

1095 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

1101 ms

post-65.css

post-65.css

1105 ms

css

css

31 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1119 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1137 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1146 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

1313 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1543 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1324 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

1341 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

1364 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

1374 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1529 ms

index.js

index.js

1653 ms

index.js

index.js

1653 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

1653 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1654 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

1757 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1760 ms

ResizeSensor.min.js

ResizeSensor.min.js

1763 ms

sticky-sidebar.min.js

sticky-sidebar.min.js

1785 ms

jquery.jsticky.js

jquery.jsticky.js

1817 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1607 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1516 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1334 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1333 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1354 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1382 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1387 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1505 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1336 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1331 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1358 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1389 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1385 ms

jet-sticky-frontend.js

jet-sticky-frontend.js

1495 ms

logo.png

logo.png

833 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

2164 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

1758 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

2049 ms

l1.jpg

l1.jpg

1846 ms

l2.jpg

l2.jpg

2126 ms

l3.jpg

l3.jpg

1933 ms

lakev.jpg

lakev.jpg

1982 ms

s1.jpeg

s1.jpeg

2077 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

35 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

45 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

46 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

46 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

45 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

45 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

48 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

2092 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

2145 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

2440 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

46 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

70 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

68 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

69 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

70 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

2244 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

70 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

70 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

72 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

72 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

72 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

71 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

72 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

73 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

73 ms

Accessibility Review

lakeviewgarden.in accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lakeviewgarden.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lakeviewgarden.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lakeviewgarden.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lakeviewgarden.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lakeviewgarden.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lakeview Garden. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: