Tools & Wizards About Us
laschet.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

laschet.com

Engineering Service Provider + Technical Consultancy (Vibration Analysis) - Laschet Consulting GmbH

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

788 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

laschet.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Laschet content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laschet.com

CAE vibration analysis and simulation of torsional, lateral, flexural vibrations in drive systems including expert report. Learn more ...

Visit laschet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Laschet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 788 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

laschet.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.laschet.com

788 ms

css

33 ms

autoptimize_728bb588fbb449f052204b36c6ef5907.css

412 ms

autoptimize_single_eacb7edeae037e826e3b2ec7e70a5700.css

308 ms

autoptimize_single_553aeb80a765edc159bfe26bafabeb38.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Laschet.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Laschet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

170.3 kB

After Optimization

120.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Laschet.com main page is 170.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 67.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laschet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 47 B

  • Original 38.8 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laschet.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laschet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.laschet.com

www.laschet.com

788 ms

css

css

33 ms

autoptimize_728bb588fbb449f052204b36c6ef5907.css

autoptimize_728bb588fbb449f052204b36c6ef5907.css

412 ms

autoptimize_single_eacb7edeae037e826e3b2ec7e70a5700.css

autoptimize_single_eacb7edeae037e826e3b2ec7e70a5700.css

308 ms

autoptimize_single_553aeb80a765edc159bfe26bafabeb38.css

autoptimize_single_553aeb80a765edc159bfe26bafabeb38.css

310 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

420 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

426 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

663 ms

autoptimize_8743a6dd3a218a2638d8c0de1cad35cd.js

autoptimize_8743a6dd3a218a2638d8c0de1cad35cd.js

878 ms

Dr-Andreas-Laschet-187x300.jpg

Dr-Andreas-Laschet-187x300.jpg

417 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

45 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

3 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

509 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

106 ms

lc-logo-1200x150.png

lc-logo-1200x150.png

400 ms

grossbritannien.gif

grossbritannien.gif

304 ms

Accessibility Review

laschet.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

laschet.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

laschet.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laschet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Laschet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

laschet.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laschet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: