4 sec in total
246 ms
3.4 sec
407 ms
Click here to check amazing Laserscript content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about laserscript.co.uk
The Laserscipt range of machinery includes CO2 and fibre laser engraving and cutting machines, CNC routers, waterjet and pipe cutting machines
Visit laserscript.co.ukWe analyzed Laserscript.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
laserscript.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value310 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
246 ms
916 ms
34 ms
79 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Laserscript.co.uk, 83% (101 requests) were made to Laserscript.net and 12% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (953 ms) relates to the external source Laserscript.net.
Page size can be reduced by 200.6 kB (19%)
1.1 MB
852.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Laserscript.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 483.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Laserscript images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laserscript.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 93 (90%)
103
10
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laserscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
laserscript.co.uk
246 ms
www.laserscript.net
916 ms
css
34 ms
style.min.css
79 ms
styles.min.css
156 ms
style.css
233 ms
font-awesome.min.css
235 ms
style.min.css
237 ms
style.css
240 ms
dripicons.css
239 ms
stylesheet.min.css
387 ms
print.css
310 ms
style_dynamic.css
312 ms
responsive.min.css
417 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
316 ms
js_composer.min.css
421 ms
custom_css.css
437 ms
style.css
436 ms
formreset.min.css
438 ms
formsmain.min.css
462 ms
readyclass.min.css
466 ms
browsers.min.css
468 ms
frontend.min.js
469 ms
jquery.min.js
547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
471 ms
jquery.json.min.js
537 ms
gravityforms.min.js
541 ms
qode-like.min.js
543 ms
core.min.js
544 ms
accordion.min.js
546 ms
menu.min.js
614 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
616 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
622 ms
dom-ready.min.js
620 ms
hooks.min.js
621 ms
i18n.min.js
623 ms
a11y.min.js
693 ms
autocomplete.min.js
694 ms
controlgroup.min.js
701 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
630 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
27 ms
js
66 ms
button.min.js
554 ms
datepicker.min.js
479 ms
mouse.min.js
609 ms
resizable.min.js
610 ms
draggable.min.js
608 ms
dialog.min.js
608 ms
droppable.min.js
536 ms
progressbar.min.js
535 ms
selectable.min.js
606 ms
sortable.min.js
593 ms
slider.min.js
571 ms
style.css
488 ms
spinner.min.js
570 ms
tooltip.min.js
571 ms
tabs.min.js
647 ms
effect.min.js
622 ms
effect-blind.min.js
616 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
615 ms
effect-clip.min.js
614 ms
effect-drop.min.js
618 ms
effect-explode.min.js
566 ms
effect-fade.min.js
563 ms
effect-fold.min.js
559 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
559 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
580 ms
effect-size.min.js
617 ms
effect-scale.min.js
592 ms
effect-shake.min.js
591 ms
effect-slide.min.js
586 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
584 ms
plugins.js
899 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
728 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
697 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
826 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
729 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
817 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
953 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
950 ms
jquery.stretch.js
816 ms
imagesloaded.js
821 ms
rangeslider.min.js
821 ms
jquery.event.move.js
820 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
837 ms
TweenLite.min.js
837 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
763 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
681 ms
default_dynamic.js
680 ms
default.min.js
694 ms
custom_js.js
744 ms
comment-reply.min.js
738 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
146 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
146 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
186 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
672 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
681 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
681 ms
wp-embed.min.js
687 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
777 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
109 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
108 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
108 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
111 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
114 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
110 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
113 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
113 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
112 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
872 ms
1690-bed-etch-mini-style.jpg
232 ms
laserscript-logo@2x.png
80 ms
logo01.png
281 ms
LS3060-MAIN-Test-350x350.webp
87 ms
1390WebSq.jpg
161 ms
CNC-1325-RightSq-350x350.jpg
88 ms
LS110-iso-right1000x1000-1-350x350.jpg
88 ms
laserscript.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laserscript.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
laserscript.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laserscript.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Laserscript.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laserscript.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Laserscript. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: