3.1 sec in total
32 ms
2.6 sec
468 ms
Click here to check amazing LBM Journal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lbmjournal.com
Industry trends, data, products and best practices for lumberyards, building material distributors, wholesalers manufacturers, and service providers.
Visit lbmjournal.comWe analyzed Lbmjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
lbmjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value1,470 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.056
98/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
32 ms
677 ms
143 ms
64 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Lbmjournal.com, 21% (23 requests) were made to Lbmjournal.advertserve.com and 17% (19 requests) were made to Assets-lbmjournal-com.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) belongs to the original domain Lbmjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 383.4 kB (28%)
1.4 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Lbmjournal.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 862.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 382.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 382.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 800 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LBM Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 192 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
80
22
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LBM Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lbmjournal.com
32 ms
lbmjournal.com
677 ms
1515848.js
143 ms
valet-public.css
64 ms
font-awesome.css
62 ms
frontend.css
66 ms
frontend.min.css
73 ms
flatpickr.min.css
72 ms
select2.min.css
73 ms
yop-poll-public-6.5.31.css
84 ms
style.css
81 ms
css
62 ms
style.css
85 ms
style.css
88 ms
td_legacy_main.css
92 ms
td_standard_pack_main.css
104 ms
tdb_main.css
99 ms
stub-v2.js
55 ms
safe-tcf-v2.js
61 ms
stub.js
55 ms
iubenda_cs.js
62 ms
jquery.min.js
106 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
103 ms
valet-public.js
105 ms
flatpickr.min.js
108 ms
select2.min.js
118 ms
yop-poll-public-6.5.31.min.js
120 ms
css
33 ms
css
39 ms
css
35 ms
core.min.js
80 ms
mouse.min.js
78 ms
draggable.min.js
80 ms
menu.min.js
81 ms
selectmenu.min.js
94 ms
dom-ready.min.js
92 ms
hooks.min.js
94 ms
i18n.min.js
424 ms
a11y.min.js
423 ms
autocomplete.min.js
422 ms
slider.min.js
423 ms
datepicker.min.js
424 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
424 ms
js_functions.js
424 ms
frontend.min.js
424 ms
tagdiv_theme.min.js
425 ms
tdPostImages.js
423 ms
tdSmartSidebar.js
412 ms
tdSocialSharing.js
410 ms
tdModalPostImages.js
410 ms
js_files_for_front.min.js
404 ms
cp-popup.min.js
403 ms
tdToTop.js
396 ms
tdAjaxSearch.js
393 ms
tdbSearch.js
393 ms
tdbMenu.js
389 ms
gtm.js
251 ms
libcode3.js
243 ms
lbm-logo-boxed.png
343 ms
logo.png
395 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf
289 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf
328 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf
330 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf
332 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
331 ms
newspaper.woff
104 ms
1724040659701
108 ms
pageview
239 ms
UXpTdwpk-Bliffert-Lumber-696x392.jpg
240 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
226 ms
Rising-prices-696x392.jpg
218 ms
MS24-D-190385-MoistureShield-LBM-Journal-August-Digital-Product-Showcase-08-24-696x392.jpg
301 ms
1280x720_RS17916_0E0A4665-696x392.jpg
221 ms
REPLAY.0815EpicorTAL1280-696x392.jpg
299 ms
zone
142 ms
zone
182 ms
PLM-branded-content-696x464.jpg
331 ms
US-LBM-696x392.jpg
193 ms
mfm-building-products-announces-expansion-696x392.jpg
329 ms
01-WiseCoat-Claer-w-Tints-Boards-696x392.jpg
220 ms
Product-Picks-1280x720-v3-696x392.jpg
189 ms
0424ProdMarvinCLiCSplit-696x392.jpg
292 ms
0524FastenMasterDFC-696x392.jpg
295 ms
0424ProdRmax-696x392.jpg
294 ms
0524FlexmasteerTread-e1715267725862-696x312.jpg
295 ms
0524BravaRoofTiles-696x392.jpg
352 ms
zone
19 ms
zone
19 ms
zone
43 ms
zone
42 ms
zone
121 ms
zone
123 ms
zone
120 ms
zone
123 ms
zone
123 ms
zone
120 ms
zone
121 ms
zone
123 ms
zone
57 ms
1722006855___2024LBMJournal1280x720Image1002-696x392.jpg
62 ms
UVpXWb9h-1-696x392.jpg
61 ms
1721152512___DFTBKPSBlackOnyxInfillLBMJournalBrandedContentJuly20241280x720-696x392.jpg
61 ms
zone
436 ms
zone
435 ms
zone
54 ms
zone
55 ms
zone
54 ms
diffuser.js
117 ms
cp-popup.min.css
94 ms
lbmjournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lbmjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lbmjournal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lbmjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lbmjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lbmjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LBM Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: