2.1 sec in total
121 ms
1.3 sec
722 ms
Click here to check amazing LDP content for Mexico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ldp.mx
Somos una empresa proveedora de servicios integrales de tecnología. Hosting web, registro de dominios, diseño de páginas web, marketing y SEO.
Visit ldp.mxWe analyzed Ldp.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ldp.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
121 ms
118 ms
100 ms
210 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ldp.mx, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (360 ms) belongs to the original domain Ldp.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 146.1 kB (9%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ldp.mx main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LDP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 969 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ldp.mx has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (59%)
61
25
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LDP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ldp.mx
121 ms
ldp.mx
118 ms
www.ldp.mx
100 ms
www.ldp.mx
210 ms
css
45 ms
font-awesome.min.css
17 ms
bootstrap.min.css
53 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
42 ms
animate.min.css
38 ms
owl.carousel.css
46 ms
magnific-popup.css
81 ms
fakeLoader.css
61 ms
style.css
138 ms
responsive-style.css
129 ms
theme-color-7.css
58 ms
custom.css
61 ms
bootstrap-formhelpers.css
73 ms
logo.png
74 ms
logo_blanco.png
74 ms
email-decode.min.js
75 ms
jquery-3.1.0.min.js
90 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
95 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
91 ms
bootstrap.min.js
94 ms
fakeLoader.min.js
106 ms
jquery.sticky.js
108 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
105 ms
jquery.tubular.1.0.js
113 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
123 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
345 ms
animatescroll.min.js
127 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
126 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
358 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
347 ms
main.js
348 ms
js
72 ms
conversion.js
58 ms
computer-hub.png
348 ms
google1.jpg
360 ms
email3.png
350 ms
webdesign1.jpeg
349 ms
webhosting2.jpeg
352 ms
correo-corporativo2.jpeg
352 ms
adwords.jpeg
343 ms
rendimiento1.jpeg
323 ms
seguridad1.jpeg
322 ms
seguridad2.jpeg
319 ms
soporte.jpeg
309 ms
uptime.jpeg
307 ms
avatar-hombre.png
307 ms
avatar-mujer.png
306 ms
PartnerBadge-CMYK.png
291 ms
payment-methods.png
292 ms
iframe_api
152 ms
bootstrap-formhelpers-countries.flags.png
38 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
96 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
120 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
149 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
159 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
161 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
248 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
162 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
script.js
329 ms
212 ms
fbevents.js
127 ms
bg-datacenter3.jpeg
79 ms
bg-datacenter2.jpeg
78 ms
www-widgetapi.js
14 ms
collect
42 ms
28 ms
js
53 ms
ldp.mx accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ldp.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ldp.mx SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ldp.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ldp.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ldp.mx
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LDP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: