Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

lengemann.us

Land Surveying Equipment |Surveying Supplies | Topcon Machine Control | Topcon GPS | Topcon Robotic Total Stations | Rotating Lasers | Total Stations ...

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

954 ms

Page Rendered

177 ms

lengemann.us screenshot

About Website

Visit lengemann.us now to see the best up-to-date Lengemann content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lengemann.us

Shop Lengemann in Florida for Topcon GPS or Sokkia GPS, Topcon Machine Control, Topcon Land Surveying Instruments or Sokkia Land Surveying Instruments and Construction-Surveying Field Supplies

Visit lengemann.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Lengemann.us page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lengemann.us performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.524

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lengemann.us

120 ms

www.lengemann.us

237 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

127 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.js

105 ms

json2.js

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Lengemann.us, 20% (13 requests) were made to 02e434b.netsolstores.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Seal.networksolutions.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) belongs to the original domain Lengemann.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 496.2 kB (75%)

Content Size

663.9 kB

After Optimization

167.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Lengemann.us main page is 663.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 294.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 220.2 kB

  • Original 229.9 kB
  • After minification 50.9 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 179.0 kB, which is 78% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.2 kB or 96% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 77.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lengemann needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 221.9 kB

  • Original 294.8 kB
  • After minification 224.4 kB
  • After compression 72.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 40.9 kB

  • Original 48.3 kB
  • After minification 38.6 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lengemann.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lengemann. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lengemann.us accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lengemann.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lengemann.us SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lengemann.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lengemann.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lengemann. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: