Tools & Wizards About Us
lifelineplacements.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

lifelineplacements.com

Manpower Consultancy in Chennai | Chennai Job Placement Services - IT / BPO / Call Center / Logistics / Banking / Hotels / Housekeeping | Best Securit...

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

680 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

256 ms

lifelineplacements.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lifeline Placement S content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifelineplacements.com

LIFELINE PLACEMENTS is one of the best manpower consultancy company in chennai. Chennai Job Placement Services - IT, BPO, Call Center Logistics, Housekeeping, Banking & Hotels. best security agency in...

Visit lifelineplacements.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifelineplacements.com page load time and found that the first response time was 680 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifelineplacements.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifelineplacements.com

680 ms

bootstrap.min.css

442 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

427 ms

animate.css

447 ms

css-plugin-collections.css

904 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelineplacements.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifelineplacements.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifelineplacements.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 975.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 52.3 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 177 B

  • Original 975.8 kB
  • After minification 975.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeline Placement S images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 459.4 kB
  • After minification 459.4 kB
  • After compression 454.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 168.7 kB
  • After minification 168.4 kB
  • After compression 148.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifelineplacements.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeline Placement S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifelineplacements.com

lifelineplacements.com

680 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

442 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

427 ms

animate.css

animate.css

447 ms

css-plugin-collections.css

css-plugin-collections.css

904 ms

menuzord-boxed.css

menuzord-boxed.css

450 ms

style-main.css

style-main.css

690 ms

preloader.css

preloader.css

643 ms

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

661 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

698 ms

settings.css

settings.css

699 ms

layers.css

layers.css

861 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

883 ms

theme-skin-color-set1.css

theme-skin-color-set1.css

927 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

1150 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1386 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1076 ms

jquery-plugin-collection.js

jquery-plugin-collection.js

1770 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1131 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1158 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1294 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

1360 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

1373 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

1385 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

1512 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

1583 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

1596 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

1609 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

1610 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

1726 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1122 ms

font-awesome-animation.min.css

font-awesome-animation.min.css

1133 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

1147 ms

elegant-icons.css

elegant-icons.css

1148 ms

utility-classes.css

utility-classes.css

1255 ms

css

css

29 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

225 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

1330 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

411 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

126 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

127 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

181 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

190 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

821 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

192 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

193 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

193 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

191 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

190 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

193 ms

abt.jpg

abt.jpg

913 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

645 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

668 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

680 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1104 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1119 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

923 ms

init.js

init.js

159 ms

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

923 ms

style-switcher.html

style-switcher.html

1027 ms

p6.png

p6.png

1038 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

1103 ms

Accessibility Review

lifelineplacements.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lifelineplacements.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

lifelineplacements.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelineplacements.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifelineplacements.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifelineplacements.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeline Placement S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: