Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

lifelock-discount.com

LifeLock Official Site | Identity Theft Protection

Page Load Speed

24.3 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

22.6 sec

Page Rendered

442 ms

lifelock-discount.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lifelock-discount.com homepage info - get ready to check Life Lock Discount best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lifelock-discount.com

LifeLock monitors for identity theft and threats. Sign up with one of the most trusted identity theft protection providers to help safeguard your credit, identity and bank accounts against identity th...

Visit lifelock-discount.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifelock-discount.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

lifelock-discount.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,440 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifelock-discount.com

1238 ms

www.lifelock-discount.com

1342 ms

style.css

59 ms

style-font.css

108 ms

style-responsive.css

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Lifelock-discount.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Sucuri.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Botw.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 257.4 kB (65%)

Content Size

395.7 kB

After Optimization

138.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Lifelock-discount.com main page is 395.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 170.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 35.5 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Life Lock Discount needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 115.1 kB

  • Original 170.5 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 109.5 kB

  • Original 129.1 kB
  • After minification 108.5 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifelock-discount.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (66%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life Lock Discount. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lifelock-discount.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

lifelock-discount.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lifelock-discount.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifelock-discount.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifelock-discount.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life Lock Discount. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: