Tools & Wizards About Us
lifeselctor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

lifeselctor.com

lifeselctor.com - This website is for sale! - lifeselctor Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

876 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

285 ms

lifeselctor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifeselctor.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifeselctor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeselctor.com

This website is for sale! lifeselctor.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, lifeselctor.co...

Visit lifeselctor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifeselctor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 876 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifeselctor.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,200 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.206

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lifeselctor.com

876 ms

px.js

74 ms

px.js

77 ms

caf.js

80 ms

newcafv2.js

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeselctor.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to D3sxcf6d4hxjd9.cloudfront.net and 14% (2 requests) were made to Dp.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (876 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifeselctor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.2 kB (57%)

Content Size

432.5 kB

After Optimization

186.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lifeselctor.com main page is 432.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 26.2 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 25.2 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Lifeselctor needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 220.7 kB

  • Original 380.8 kB
  • After minification 375.8 kB
  • After compression 160.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeselctor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lifeselctor.com

lifeselctor.com

876 ms

px.js

px.js

74 ms

px.js

px.js

77 ms

caf.js

caf.js

80 ms

newcafv2.js

newcafv2.js

12 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

52 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

63 ms

arrows.jpg

arrows.jpg

52 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

60 ms

slave.html

slave.html

36 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

161 ms

async_survey

async_survey

15 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

14 ms

prompt_embed_static.js

prompt_embed_static.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

lifeselctor.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lifeselctor.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

lifeselctor.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    >

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeselctor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lifeselctor.com main page’s claimed encoding is >. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifeselctor.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeselctor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: