Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

ruv.de

R+V Versicherung

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

722 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

ruv.de screenshot

About Website

Visit ruv.de now to see the best up-to-date Ruv content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ruv.de

Die R+V Versicherung ist einer der größten Versicherer Deutschlands und gehört zur Genossenschaftlichen FinanzGruppe Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken.

Visit ruv.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ruv.de page load time and found that the first response time was 722 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ruv.de performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,920 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

722 ms

loader.js

26 ms

uc-block.bundle.js

38 ms

style.css

882 ms

script.js

1111 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Ruv.de, 4% (2 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu and 4% (2 requests) were made to Stats.ruv.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ruv.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.4 kB (40%)

Content Size

421.3 kB

After Optimization

251.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Ruv.de main page is 421.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 169.4 kB

  • Original 201.0 kB
  • After minification 179.1 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 220.3 kB
  • After minification 220.3 kB
  • After compression 220.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (31%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ruv. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ruv.de accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ruv.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ruv.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ruv.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ruv.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ruv. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: