Tools & Wizards About Us
lingo.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

lingo.digital

Lingo PR Brisbane | Public Relations | Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

13.3 sec in total

First Response

3.3 sec

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

lingo.digital screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lingo.digital homepage info - get ready to check Lingo best content right away, or after learning these important things about lingo.digital

Lingo PR & Digital – Brisbane Public Relations agency specialising in PR, digital marketing, content creation, tourism, events and retail marketing.

Visit lingo.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Lingo.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lingo.digital performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lingo.digital

3319 ms

jkv7imw.css

104 ms

style.min.css

220 ms

style.min.css

434 ms

style.css

644 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Lingo.digital, 6% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lingo.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lingo.digital main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 123.5 kB

  • Original 144.8 kB
  • After minification 141.2 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 850 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lingo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 212 B

  • Original 217.2 kB
  • After minification 217.2 kB
  • After compression 217.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 130.4 kB
  • After minification 130.4 kB
  • After compression 129.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lingo.digital has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lingo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lingo.digital

lingo.digital

3319 ms

jkv7imw.css

jkv7imw.css

104 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

220 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

434 ms

style.css

style.css

644 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

648 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

648 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

864 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

646 ms

post-15704.css

post-15704.css

653 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1294 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

874 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

861 ms

global.css

global.css

868 ms

post-66.css

post-66.css

877 ms

post-73.css

post-73.css

1078 ms

post-99.css

post-99.css

1085 ms

css

css

32 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

1081 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

1088 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

1091 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1510 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1307 ms

main.js

main.js

1307 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

1308 ms

post-320.css

post-320.css

1307 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

1505 ms

dynamic-conditions-public.js

dynamic-conditions-public.js

1607 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1608 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1609 ms

elfsight-instagram-feed.js

elfsight-instagram-feed.js

1741 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1721 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1723 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1730 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1729 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1735 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1935 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1940 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1944 ms

p.css

p.css

21 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1729 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1520 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1319 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1512 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

1512 ms

ga.js

ga.js

100 ms

Lingo_Logo_Black.png

Lingo_Logo_Black.png

635 ms

home-hero.jpg

home-hero.jpg

1486 ms

ELM-Cover.jpg

ELM-Cover.jpg

1275 ms

image0-1024x683.jpeg

image0-1024x683.jpeg

860 ms

2015_Sept_MountBarney_HikingSunset_LG_LOWRES-1490-1-1024x683.jpg

2015_Sept_MountBarney_HikingSunset_LG_LOWRES-1490-1-1024x683.jpg

1051 ms

Untitled-7-785x1024.jpg

Untitled-7-785x1024.jpg

1267 ms

JamesLane-16-copy.jpg

JamesLane-16-copy.jpg

1483 ms

Rhubarb.jpg

Rhubarb.jpg

1075 ms

Group-2.png

Group-2.png

1266 ms

Group-4.png

Group-4.png

1290 ms

Group-8.png

Group-8.png

1480 ms

Group-9.png

Group-9.png

1482 ms

Group-11.png

Group-11.png

1489 ms

Group-12.png

Group-12.png

1503 ms

Group-13.png

Group-13.png

1693 ms

Group-14.png

Group-14.png

1695 ms

Group-15.png

Group-15.png

1696 ms

Group-16.png

Group-16.png

1698 ms

Group-17.png

Group-17.png

1626 ms

Group-18.png

Group-18.png

1642 ms

Group-19.png

Group-19.png

1831 ms

d

d

23 ms

d

d

23 ms

d

d

32 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1833 ms

d

d

93 ms

d

d

32 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf

30 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

55 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDXbtY.ttf

70 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

76 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf

92 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtY.ttf

91 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

55 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

1728 ms

Group-20.png

Group-20.png

1726 ms

Group-21.png

Group-21.png

1720 ms

Group-22.png

Group-22.png

1738 ms

Group-23.png

Group-23.png

1917 ms

Group-24.png

Group-24.png

1868 ms

Group-25.png

Group-25.png

1718 ms

Group-26.png

Group-26.png

1719 ms

Group-27.png

Group-27.png

1732 ms

Group-28.png

Group-28.png

1919 ms

Group-29.png

Group-29.png

1914 ms

Lingo_Logo_Footer.png

Lingo_Logo_Footer.png

1720 ms

diagonal.png

diagonal.png

1714 ms

line-glitter.png

line-glitter.png

1728 ms

Accessibility Review

lingo.digital accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lingo.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lingo.digital SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lingo.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lingo.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lingo.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lingo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: