5.7 sec in total
755 ms
4.7 sec
190 ms
Click here to check amazing Litcult content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about litcult.ru
Проект ЛитКульт создан для людей, которым небезразличны современная литература и культура. Этот сайт является площадкой для публикации работ опытных и начинающих авторов, а также предоставляет возможн...
Visit litcult.ruWe analyzed Litcult.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 755 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
litcult.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.8 s
0/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value3,150 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
755 ms
476 ms
486 ms
350 ms
705 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Litcult.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Vk.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Litcult.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (54%)
2.0 MB
912.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Litcult.ru main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Litcult needs image optimization as it can save up to 141.4 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 756.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 756.9 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litcult.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (13%)
63
55
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litcult. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
litcult.ru
755 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
476 ms
portal-nocolors.css
486 ms
theme.css
350 ms
tiny_mce.js
705 ms
portal.js
1752 ms
openapi.js
385 ms
client.min.js
363 ms
api.js
40 ms
openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js
272 ms
recaptcha__en.js
729 ms
headerBgImage.jpg
937 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
1260 ms
logoImage.jpg
719 ms
1676459526.jpg
717 ms
sm_foto.jpg
718 ms
sm_foto.jpg
717 ms
sm_foto.jpg
717 ms
sm_foto.jpg
814 ms
sm_foto.jpg
814 ms
sm_foto.jpg
815 ms
sm_foto.jpg
814 ms
sm_foto.jpg
815 ms
sm_86832.jpg
931 ms
sm_91795.jpg
931 ms
sm_98279.jpg
929 ms
sm_89018.jpg
931 ms
sm_5092.jpg
931 ms
no-avatar.gif
1041 ms
sm_73582.jpg
1050 ms
sm_91009.jpg
1051 ms
sm_103416.jpg
1052 ms
1676617881.jpg
1163 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1052 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1156 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1159 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1164 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1164 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1165 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1271 ms
sm_foto.jpg
1275 ms
sm_89450.jpg
1281 ms
sm_104266.jpg
1280 ms
sm_96614.jpg
1281 ms
sm_105175.jpg
1281 ms
sm_31.jpg
1386 ms
sm_88972.jpg
1390 ms
1500803185.jpg
1512 ms
hit
245 ms
sm_image.jpg
686 ms
xdmHelper.094dd74ce04e31fd7adebb51d558df42.js
136 ms
sm_image.jpg
685 ms
sm_image.jpg
687 ms
sm_image.jpg
788 ms
sm_image.jpg
789 ms
tag.js
859 ms
sm_foto.jpg
704 ms
sm_foto.jpg
705 ms
sm_foto.jpg
704 ms
lc16.png
818 ms
c2_roundCorners_border_ffffff_5E5F41_4_0_31.png
817 ms
c2_roundCorners_border_ffffff_5E5F41_4_170_700.png
708 ms
pack1.png
940 ms
stars.png
706 ms
hit
505 ms
advert.gif
548 ms
litcult.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
litcult.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
litcult.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Document uses plugins
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litcult.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Litcult.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litcult.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litcult. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: