10.7 sec in total
449 ms
9.5 sec
714 ms
Visit litegation.com now to see the best up-to-date Litegation content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litegation.com
Providing Litigation Support Services such as Professional Consulting, Trial Technology, And Matter(Discovery) Management That Supports Your Litigation
Visit litegation.comWe analyzed Litegation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
litegation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value5,320 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.454
20/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
449 ms
3318 ms
49 ms
301 ms
275 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Litegation.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Litegation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 613.9 kB (9%)
6.8 MB
6.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Litegation.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Litegation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 413.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litegation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (54%)
67
31
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litegation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
litegation.com
449 ms
litegation.com
3318 ms
js
49 ms
style.min.css
301 ms
frontend.min.css
275 ms
flatpickr.min.css
213 ms
select2.min.css
215 ms
css
55 ms
style.css
302 ms
full-styles.6.1.1.css
453 ms
mkhb-render.css
402 ms
mkhb-row.css
426 ms
mkhb-column.css
425 ms
js_composer.min.css
578 ms
theme-options-production-1652900887.css
570 ms
style.css
657 ms
modern.css
658 ms
webfontloader.js
652 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
823 ms
jquery.min.js
822 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
894 ms
flatpickr.min.js
942 ms
select2.min.js
1037 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
frontend.min.js
939 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
971 ms
custom.js
1004 ms
idle-timer.min.js
1173 ms
full-scripts.6.1.1.js
1595 ms
mkhb-render.js
1254 ms
mkhb-column.js
1238 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1349 ms
collect
18 ms
css
112 ms
7TOg-PxIAfs
220 ms
5Ed8wHWKqSc
303 ms
pHHP5t4ctes
308 ms
litmenu-1.png
3784 ms
litegation-website-white-logo.png
2279 ms
litegation-website-logo.png
2277 ms
njlj09012021501912litegation_generic_winner-300x300.png
3123 ms
njlj09012021501912litegation_generic_hof-300x292.png
3346 ms
ediscovery-process-mtzdy57ol3ek3scbvfk6jw9sqaus4opkvtdzxvy4c0.jpg
3430 ms
dummy-transparent-nm80slgtsua0fa1eei3959iw3ntqoqqg6wtzs9oex4.png
3428 ms
Litegation_eBook_3002.jpg
3681 ms
logo_W_BL.png
3778 ms
litegation-blogs-3-150x150.png
3958 ms
litegation-blogs-150x150.png
3998 ms
shutterstock_618880562-150x150.jpg
4060 ms
generate-captcha.php
4540 ms
www-player.css
97 ms
www-embed-player.js
189 ms
base.js
2408 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
65 ms
web-video-1.png
2185 ms
web-video-2.png
2138 ms
bigstock-Business-people-shaking-hands-13867664.jpg
2408 ms
instagram.png
1927 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1362 ms
ad_status.js
517 ms
JvCqqlKDWxh3fBIjR_Q6tqdWI7LpeJg2tF6wEWG4A0E.js
391 ms
embed.js
231 ms
id
24 ms
Create
341 ms
Create
345 ms
Create
346 ms
GenerateIT
19 ms
GenerateIT
21 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
litegation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litegation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
litegation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litegation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Litegation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litegation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Litegation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: