Tools & Wizards About Us
livingafield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

livingafield.com

Michigan Outdoor Wilderness Skills Survival Training Classes

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

83 ms

Resources Loaded

394 ms

Page Rendered

755 ms

livingafield.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to livingafield.com homepage info - get ready to check Livingafield best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about livingafield.com

Michigan outdoor training school. Offering classes in wilderness skills, bushcraft, survival, edible and medicinal plants, emergency survival, plant based medicine, land navigation, orienteering, surv...

Visit livingafield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Livingafield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

livingafield.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

livingafield.com

83 ms

js

60 ms

livingafield.css

72 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

22 ms

menu-icon.png

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Livingafield.com, 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (195 ms) belongs to the original domain Livingafield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 684.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

7.1 MB

After Optimization

6.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Livingafield.com main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 541.6 kB

  • Original 7.0 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livingafield images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 126.0 kB

  • Original 137.4 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livingafield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livingafield. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

livingafield.com

livingafield.com

83 ms

js

js

60 ms

livingafield.css

livingafield.css

72 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

22 ms

menu-icon.png

menu-icon.png

29 ms

logo.png

logo.png

141 ms

hdr_classes-350.png

hdr_classes-350.png

123 ms

hdr_outdoororacle-350.png

hdr_outdoororacle-350.png

115 ms

hdr_homesteading-350.png

hdr_homesteading-350.png

120 ms

hdr_herbal-350.png

hdr_herbal-350.png

123 ms

hdr_plants-350.png

hdr_plants-350.png

116 ms

hdr_mushrooms-350.png

hdr_mushrooms-350.png

195 ms

hdr_grounding-350.png

hdr_grounding-350.png

164 ms

hdr_wildernessskills-350.png

hdr_wildernessskills-350.png

181 ms

Accessibility Review

livingafield.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

livingafield.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

livingafield.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livingafield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livingafield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

livingafield.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livingafield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: