Tools & Wizards About Us
loadingarms.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

loadingarms.in

Loading Arms, Loading Arm Systems, Manufacturer, Supplier

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

856 ms

Page Rendered

251 ms

loadingarms.in screenshot

About Website

Visit loadingarms.in now to see the best up-to-date Loading Arms content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about loadingarms.in

Loading Arms, Unloading Arm Systems, Swivel Joints, Floating Suction Assemblies, Prover Tanks, Heat Exchangers, Manufacturer, India, Saudi Arabia

Visit loadingarms.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Loadingarms.in page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loadingarms.in performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.264

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loadingarms.in

165 ms

loadingarms.in

160 ms

js

62 ms

bootstrap.min.css

77 ms

font-awesome.min.css

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Loadingarms.in, 21% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (381 ms) belongs to the original domain Loadingarms.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loadingarms.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 30.5 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Loading Arms images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 720 B

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 60.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 44.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loadingarms.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loading Arms. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loadingarms.in

loadingarms.in

165 ms

loadingarms.in

loadingarms.in

160 ms

js

js

62 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

77 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

109 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

110 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

112 ms

style.css

style.css

113 ms

color-01.css

color-01.css

107 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

105 ms

ifa-logo.png

ifa-logo.png

137 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

360 ms

slider-2.jpg

slider-2.jpg

357 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

360 ms

welcome.jpg

welcome.jpg

171 ms

loading-un-Loading-arm-systems.jpg

loading-un-Loading-arm-systems.jpg

204 ms

floating-suction-assemblies.jpg

floating-suction-assemblies.jpg

197 ms

prover-tanks.jpg

prover-tanks.jpg

235 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

309 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

238 ms

menumaker.min.js

menumaker.min.js

323 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

324 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

325 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

326 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

326 ms

custom.js

custom.js

334 ms

hr-2.jpg

hr-2.jpg

355 ms

purchase-2.jpg

purchase-2.jpg

357 ms

email-00.jpg

email-00.jpg

381 ms

css

css

36 ms

footer-top-bg.png

footer-top-bg.png

233 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

34 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

43 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

51 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

68 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

67 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

55 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

68 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

95 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

87 ms

1

1

191 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

93 ms

Accessibility Review

loadingarms.in accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

loadingarms.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

loadingarms.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loadingarms.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loadingarms.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loadingarms.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Loading Arms. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: