Tools & Wizards About Us
lodishell.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

lodishell.net

Towing & Auto Repair Services in Lodi, WI | Lodi Shell

Page Load Speed

380 ms in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

321 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

lodishell.net screenshot

About Website

Visit lodishell.net now to see the best up-to-date Lodi Shell content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lodishell.net

Lodi Shell provides expert towing, car repair, & mechanic services near Lodi, WI. Call today for reliable & efficient service!

Visit lodishell.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Lodishell.net page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 321 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lodishell.net performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lodishell.net

59 ms

lodishell.net

52 ms

css

35 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

23 ms

post-13.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Lodishell.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (181 ms) belongs to the original domain Lodishell.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 151.1 kB (85%)

Content Size

177.8 kB

After Optimization

26.7 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lodishell.net main page is 177.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 176.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 151.0 kB

  • Original 176.8 kB
  • After minification 170.1 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 931 B
  • After minification 931 B
  • After compression 885 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lodishell.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (96%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lodi Shell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lodishell.net

lodishell.net

59 ms

lodishell.net

lodishell.net

52 ms

css

css

35 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

23 ms

post-13.css

post-13.css

31 ms

post-283.css

post-283.css

29 ms

cursor.css

cursor.css

49 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

32 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

48 ms

imagehover.css

imagehover.css

43 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

41 ms

exad-styles.min.css

exad-styles.min.css

121 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

46 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

59 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

56 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

68 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

69 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

66 ms

eael-33.css

eael-33.css

73 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

79 ms

global.css

global.css

103 ms

post-33.css

post-33.css

100 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

104 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

102 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

118 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

138 ms

js

js

79 ms

loader.js

loader.js

138 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

139 ms

reviews_widget.js

reviews_widget.js

138 ms

form_embed.js

form_embed.js

137 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

139 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

151 ms

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

174 ms

typed.js

typed.js

176 ms

typed.fe.js

typed.fe.js

178 ms

exad-scripts.min.js

exad-scripts.min.js

179 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

181 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

180 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

180 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

172 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

170 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

165 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

157 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

157 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

157 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

157 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

156 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

152 ms

wpr-beacon.min.js

wpr-beacon.min.js

149 ms

Accessibility Review

lodishell.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

lodishell.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lodishell.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lodishell.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lodishell.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lodishell.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lodi Shell. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: