2.2 sec in total
380 ms
1.6 sec
164 ms
Visit lofa.net now to see the best up-to-date LOFA content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lofa.net
LOFA Industries offers advanced engine control panels for mechanically and electronically governed engines including John Deere, CAT, Deutz, Yanmar and more!
Visit lofa.netWe analyzed Lofa.net page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
lofa.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
380 ms
62 ms
124 ms
186 ms
188 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Lofa.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (468 ms) belongs to the original domain Lofa.net.
Page size can be reduced by 70.1 kB (5%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lofa.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LOFA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lofa.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (59%)
44
18
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LOFA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lofa.net
380 ms
cattron-redirect.js
62 ms
frontend.css
124 ms
style.min.css
186 ms
styles.css
188 ms
style.css
254 ms
dashicons.min.css
246 ms
jquery.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
195 ms
tracking-analytics-events.js
248 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
248 ms
ivory-search.js
316 ms
scripts.js
321 ms
scripts.js
320 ms
blueberry.js
320 ms
core.min.js
322 ms
widget.min.js
320 ms
accordion.min.js
321 ms
mobile-menu.js
380 ms
wp-embed.min.js
382 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
297 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
header-bg.jpg
91 ms
header-inner3.jpg
172 ms
main-logo.png
93 ms
header-aet.png
171 ms
header-inner-logos.png
168 ms
nav-bg.jpg
169 ms
navi-left.png
170 ms
navi-right.png
169 ms
content-bg.jpg
221 ms
welcome.jpg
398 ms
new-canplus-rt.jpg
406 ms
tier-four-final.jpg
339 ms
CP640c.jpg
419 ms
CP800.jpg
347 ms
CP900.jpg
414 ms
CP1000.jpg
413 ms
feat-tech.jpg
408 ms
feat-visit.jpg
466 ms
footer-bg.jpg
468 ms
collect
13 ms
js
80 ms
ga.js
18 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
lofa.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lofa.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lofa.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lofa.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lofa.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lofa.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of LOFA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: