4.9 sec in total
299 ms
2.8 sec
1.8 sec
Visit logistics.no now to see the best up-to-date Logistics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about logistics.no
Vi er eksperter på å finne de mest kostnadseffektive løsningene for å frakte varene dine trygt til destinasjonen i tide. Vi bistår kun bedriftsmarkedet.
Visit logistics.noWe analyzed Logistics.no page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
logistics.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value56.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value3,990 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.085
93/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
299 ms
505 ms
36 ms
354 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Logistics.no, 33% (19 requests) were made to Sglogistics.no and 26% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Sglogisticsno.wpengine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.4 MB (16%)
20.7 MB
17.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Logistics.no main page is 20.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 20.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Logistics needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.3 MB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 127.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Logistics.no has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (58%)
40
17
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Logistics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
logistics.no
299 ms
sglogistics.no
505 ms
css
36 ms
style.min.css
354 ms
styles.css
38 ms
cf7.css
33 ms
oxygen.css
31 ms
style.css
45 ms
style.css
52 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
kontakt-179.css
431 ms
tjenesternorsk-178.css
44 ms
main-12.css
432 ms
forside-31.css
47 ms
universal.css
57 ms
index.js
59 ms
index.js
55 ms
api.js
87 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
59 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
68 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
68 ms
index.js
69 ms
gtm.js
112 ms
embed
219 ms
robust-logo.png
219 ms
logo_venstre_pms.png
252 ms
GettyImages-1159903290.jpg
819 ms
no.png
13 ms
en.png
53 ms
GettyImages-1250153373.png
1148 ms
P1110513-1-scaled.jpg
641 ms
GettyImages-1257175043.jpg
827 ms
GettyImages-1207355204.jpg
1070 ms
Subsea7-025.jpg
523 ms
GettyImages-1282804749.jpg
948 ms
L1008144-scaled.jpg
967 ms
recaptcha__en.js
42 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
95 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
95 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
111 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
117 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
126 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
125 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
125 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
125 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
126 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
136 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
135 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
136 ms
js
126 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
js
141 ms
collect
86 ms
collect
30 ms
logistics.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
logistics.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
logistics.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logistics.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Logistics.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
logistics.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Logistics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: