Tools & Wizards About Us
logistics.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

logistics.no

SG Logistics

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

656 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

logistics.no screenshot

About Website

Visit logistics.no now to see the best up-to-date Logistics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about logistics.no

Vi er eksperter på å finne de mest kostnadseffektive løsningene for å frakte varene dine trygt til destinasjonen i tide. Vi bistår kun bedriftsmarkedet.

Visit logistics.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Logistics.no page load time and found that the first response time was 656 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

logistics.no performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value58.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

logistics.no

656 ms

sglogistics.no

799 ms

css

36 ms

style.min.css

20 ms

styles.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Logistics.no, 34% (19 requests) were made to Sglogistics.no and 27% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Sglogisticsno.wpengine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (18%)

Content Size

21.1 MB

After Optimization

17.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Logistics.no main page is 21.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 20.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 40.4 kB
  • After minification 39.9 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.3 MB

  • Original 20.2 MB
  • After minification 16.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Logistics needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.3 MB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 484.7 kB

  • Original 842.3 kB
  • After minification 842.3 kB
  • After compression 357.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 484.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Logistics.no has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Logistics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

logistics.no

logistics.no

656 ms

sglogistics.no

sglogistics.no

799 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

20 ms

styles.css

styles.css

29 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

24 ms

oxygen.css

oxygen.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

kontakt-179.css

kontakt-179.css

431 ms

tjenesternorsk-178.css

tjenesternorsk-178.css

35 ms

main-12.css

main-12.css

435 ms

forside-31.css

forside-31.css

38 ms

universal.css

universal.css

52 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

54 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

54 ms

index.js

index.js

55 ms

index.js

index.js

56 ms

api.js

api.js

53 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

55 ms

index.js

index.js

54 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

57 ms

embed

embed

190 ms

robust-logo.png

robust-logo.png

174 ms

logo_venstre_pms.png

logo_venstre_pms.png

250 ms

GettyImages-1159903290.jpg

GettyImages-1159903290.jpg

841 ms

no.png

no.png

19 ms

en.png

en.png

17 ms

js

js

28 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

3 ms

search.js

search.js

5 ms

main.js

main.js

11 ms

GettyImages-1250153373.png

GettyImages-1250153373.png

948 ms

P1110513-1-scaled.jpg

P1110513-1-scaled.jpg

592 ms

GettyImages-1257175043.jpg

GettyImages-1257175043.jpg

777 ms

GettyImages-1207355204.jpg

GettyImages-1207355204.jpg

1027 ms

Subsea7-025.jpg

Subsea7-025.jpg

564 ms

GettyImages-1282804749.jpg

GettyImages-1282804749.jpg

780 ms

L1008144-scaled.jpg

L1008144-scaled.jpg

919 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

17 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

23 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

30 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

43 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

35 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

43 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

35 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

logistics.no accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

logistics.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

logistics.no SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Logistics.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Logistics.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

logistics.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Logistics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: