Tools & Wizards About Us
lookingglass.consulting screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

lookingglass.consulting

Strategy & Execution Partner - Looking Glass Consulting

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

837 ms

Page Rendered

232 ms

lookingglass.consulting screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Looking Glass content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lookingglass.consulting

Looking Glass Consulting designs strategy that provides our clients with a dynamic member experience and competitive advantage. In addition, we help execute on their strategies by providing an experie...

Visit lookingglass.consulting

Key Findings

We analyzed Lookingglass.consulting page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lookingglass.consulting performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lookingglass.consulting

71 ms

rs=w:1920,m

549 ms

script.js

142 ms

UX.4.39.0.js

34 ms

script.js

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lookingglass.consulting, 88% (7 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (549 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (44%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Lookingglass.consulting main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 89.0 kB

  • Original 105.2 kB
  • After minification 105.2 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Looking Glass needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 324.0 kB

  • Original 463.4 kB
  • After minification 463.4 kB
  • After compression 139.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looking Glass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lookingglass.consulting

lookingglass.consulting

71 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

549 ms

script.js

script.js

142 ms

UX.4.39.0.js

UX.4.39.0.js

34 ms

script.js

script.js

156 ms

ll

ll

172 ms

rs=w:400,cg:true,m

rs=w:400,cg:true,m

236 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

lookingglass.consulting accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

lookingglass.consulting best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lookingglass.consulting SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingglass.consulting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookingglass.consulting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lookingglass.consulting

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Looking Glass. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: