Tools & Wizards About Us
loveto.link screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

loveto.link

Love to Link - Boost Rankings with Quality Backlink Services

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

517 ms

loveto.link screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Love To content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about loveto.link

Love to Link ensures your website's growth with tailored blog outreach link building, delivering quality backlinks to boost visibility and traffic.

Visit loveto.link

Key Findings

We analyzed Loveto.link page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

loveto.link performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

loveto.link

43 ms

loveto.link

324 ms

jquery.tablesorter.pager.css

35 ms

bootstrap-v4.min.css

28 ms

theme.bootstrap_4.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Loveto.link, 4% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Paypal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 213.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Loveto.link main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 110.0 kB

  • Original 132.7 kB
  • After minification 128.3 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Love To images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 621.7 kB
  • After minification 621.0 kB
  • After compression 577.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 356.9 kB
  • After minification 356.9 kB
  • After compression 327.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Loveto.link has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (75%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Love To. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

loveto.link

loveto.link

43 ms

loveto.link

loveto.link

324 ms

jquery.tablesorter.pager.css

jquery.tablesorter.pager.css

35 ms

bootstrap-v4.min.css

bootstrap-v4.min.css

28 ms

theme.bootstrap_4.css

theme.bootstrap_4.css

24 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

39 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

25 ms

loveto-plugin.css

loveto-plugin.css

37 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

email-subscribers-public.css

email-subscribers-public.css

47 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

47 ms

css

css

46 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

55 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

56 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

78 ms

post-13689.css

post-13689.css

56 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

63 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

74 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

85 ms

global.css

global.css

82 ms

post-25497.css

post-25497.css

83 ms

post-25492.css

post-25492.css

80 ms

post-25489.css

post-25489.css

82 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

81 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

88 ms

style.css

style.css

88 ms

css

css

60 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

90 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

89 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

89 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

95 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

147 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

150 ms

jquery.tablesorter.js

jquery.tablesorter.js

152 ms

jquery.tablesorter.widgets.js

jquery.tablesorter.widgets.js

155 ms

widget-stickyHeaders.js

widget-stickyHeaders.js

158 ms

jquery.tablesorter.pager.js

jquery.tablesorter.pager.js

159 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

49 ms

js

js

3259 ms

loveto-blogs-and-pricing-table.js

loveto-blogs-and-pricing-table.js

159 ms

script.js

script.js

79 ms

loveto-plugin.js

loveto-plugin.js

188 ms

loveto-payments.js

loveto-payments.js

178 ms

jquery.base64.js

jquery.base64.js

179 ms

tableExport.js

tableExport.js

177 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

173 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

169 ms

api.js

api.js

112 ms

api.js

api.js

168 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

168 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

166 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

164 ms

pdfg.front.js

pdfg.front.js

165 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

158 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

152 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

152 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

138 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

136 ms

index.js

index.js

136 ms

index.js

index.js

134 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

134 ms

email-subscribers-public.js

email-subscribers-public.js

133 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

133 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

131 ms

index.js

index.js

133 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

128 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

128 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

129 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

126 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

127 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

124 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

73 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

68 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

67 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

62 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

61 ms

pptm.js

pptm.js

183 ms

logger

logger

133 ms

ts

ts

78 ms

logo.png

logo.png

105 ms

hero_image-1024x748.png

hero_image-1024x748.png

84 ms

mobile-980x1024.png

mobile-980x1024.png

86 ms

browse_inventory.png

browse_inventory.png

82 ms

pip3.png

pip3.png

83 ms

computer_icon-1.png

computer_icon-1.png

83 ms

chart_icon-1.png

chart_icon-1.png

84 ms

links_icon-1.png

links_icon-1.png

84 ms

circles_icon-1.png

circles_icon-1.png

85 ms

pipe.png

pipe.png

86 ms

94-q58hogeof8icwxecy6q2ekac4luiv7lwey607hrz5y.png

94-q58hogeof8icwxecy6q2ekac4luiv7lwey607hrz5y.png

87 ms

loveto-checkmark-1.png

loveto-checkmark-1.png

85 ms

client_1.png

client_1.png

86 ms

client_2.png

client_2.png

87 ms

client_3.png

client_3.png

88 ms

client_4.png

client_4.png

88 ms

testiimage5.jpg

testiimage5.jpg

88 ms

0789fbd5bd4753844d220d63f604ea2f.png

0789fbd5bd4753844d220d63f604ea2f.png

88 ms

pip4.png

pip4.png

88 ms

font

font

46 ms

font

font

64 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

429 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

396 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

407 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

259 ms

6281194.js

6281194.js

98 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

75 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

84 ms

anchor

anchor

38 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

iHowXYT9hUZIlyFRr5Um8JUZEzs-k28JIAaYyWMV82g.js

iHowXYT9hUZIlyFRr5Um8JUZEzs-k28JIAaYyWMV82g.js

32 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

62 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

22 ms

Accessibility Review

loveto.link accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

loveto.link best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

loveto.link SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Loveto.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Loveto.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

loveto.link

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Love To. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: