Tools & Wizards About Us
luratics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

luratics.com

Dogs, Dog Sports - Luratics! - San Diego, California

Page Load Speed

932 ms in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

616 ms

Page Rendered

279 ms

luratics.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to luratics.com homepage info - get ready to check Luratics best content right away, or after learning these important things about luratics.com

Lure Coursing is a FUN dog chase sport that all dogs can enjoy! Dog sports are a healthy and safe way to get out with your dog and your family.

Visit luratics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luratics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 895 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luratics.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,240 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luratics.com

37 ms

league-spartan.css

24 ms

script.js

76 ms

UX.4.37.7.js

67 ms

script.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Luratics.com, 82% (9 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 364.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

703.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luratics.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 543.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 102.7 kB

  • Original 121.2 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 543.4 kB
  • After minification 543.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luratics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 261.2 kB

  • Original 402.4 kB
  • After minification 402.4 kB
  • After compression 141.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 182 B
  • After minification 182 B
  • After compression 158 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luratics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24 B or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luratics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luratics.com

luratics.com

37 ms

league-spartan.css

league-spartan.css

24 ms

script.js

script.js

76 ms

UX.4.37.7.js

UX.4.37.7.js

67 ms

script.js

script.js

76 ms

js

js

75 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

326 ms

qt=q:95

qt=q:95

134 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

523 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

19 ms

LeagueSpartan.woff

LeagueSpartan.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

luratics.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

luratics.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

luratics.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luratics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luratics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luratics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luratics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: