1.4 sec in total
18 ms
1.1 sec
365 ms
Visit luxerunner.com now to see the best up-to-date Luxe Runner content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luxerunner.com
Professional errand services in Utah County offering grocery delivery, personal shopping, event planning, dry cleaning, post office, gift wrapping, pet services, and more.
Visit luxerunner.comWe analyzed Luxerunner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
luxerunner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value2,210 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.303
39/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
18 ms
137 ms
163 ms
382 ms
330 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Luxerunner.com, 79% (22 requests) were made to Secureservercdn.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (578 ms) relates to the external source Secureservercdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 47.9 kB (11%)
451.7 kB
403.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Luxerunner.com main page is 451.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 245.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luxe Runner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luxerunner.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (74%)
23
6
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luxe Runner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
luxerunner.com
18 ms
luxerunner.com
137 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
163 ms
style.min.css
382 ms
f0cf87f477569fc81ce4c038abda972f.css
330 ms
style.min.css
248 ms
latest.css
423 ms
16df7904c7df1fe4bb259f12901b123c.css
387 ms
dark.css
466 ms
genericons.css
469 ms
font-awesome.min.css
578 ms
css
88 ms
jquery.min.js
461 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
432 ms
spacious-custom.js
478 ms
coblocks-animation.js
512 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
490 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
489 ms
navigation.js
489 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
503 ms
luxe-bg.jpg
80 ms
Luxe-Runner_Round-100px.png
69 ms
professional-errand-service-1.jpg
80 ms
your-time-our-hands-luxe-1.jpg
80 ms
default
249 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
49 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
34 ms
luxerunner.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
luxerunner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
luxerunner.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luxerunner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luxerunner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
luxerunner.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Luxe Runner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: