Tools & Wizards About Us
luxurylvbag.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

luxurylvbag.com

Online shopping for cool products at the right price & Fast Shipping Fashion bags

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

544 ms

luxurylvbag.com screenshot

About Website

Visit luxurylvbag.com now to see the best up-to-date Luxurylvbag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about luxurylvbag.com

Online shopping for cool bags at the right price. Find out what's hot and new from our online store. It's Safe Payment and Worldwide Shipping.

Visit luxurylvbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Luxurylvbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

luxurylvbag.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.551

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

luxurylvbag.com

1195 ms

bootstrap.min.css

698 ms

webfont.css

758 ms

css.css

1113 ms

additive.css

625 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Luxurylvbag.com, 46% (25 requests) were made to Asssets.51microshop.com and 33% (18 requests) were made to Images.51microshop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Images.51microshop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Luxurylvbag.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Luxurylvbag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 91.6 kB
  • After minification 91.4 kB
  • After compression 90.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 37.8 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Luxurylvbag.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (40%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Luxurylvbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

luxurylvbag.com

luxurylvbag.com

1195 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

698 ms

webfont.css

webfont.css

758 ms

css.css

css.css

1113 ms

additive.css

additive.css

625 ms

css

css

156 ms

cart.css

cart.css

1073 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

736 ms

jquery.bttrlazyloading.min.js

jquery.bttrlazyloading.min.js

675 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

725 ms

js

js

146 ms

home_custom_design.css

home_custom_design.css

743 ms

index.css

index.css

924 ms

home.js

home.js

738 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

742 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

754 ms

TouchSlide.1.1.js

TouchSlide.1.1.js

787 ms

admin-ajax.js

admin-ajax.js

806 ms

js.js

js.js

1363 ms

PluginUit.js

PluginUit.js

838 ms

1616661867293_0.jpg

1616661867293_0.jpg

907 ms

USD.jpg

USD.jpg

571 ms

1620629553081_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1620629553081_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

928 ms

1617070752852_0.jpg_w360.jpg

1617070752852_0.jpg_w360.jpg

1140 ms

1617069938953_1.jpg_w360.jpg

1617069938953_1.jpg_w360.jpg

1304 ms

1616822467183_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616822467183_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1012 ms

1616821766561_1.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616821766561_1.jpeg_w360.jpg

988 ms

1616762036332_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616762036332_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1438 ms

1616761188701_2.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616761188701_2.jpeg_w360.jpg

1410 ms

1616751937565_1.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616751937565_1.jpeg_w360.jpg

2218 ms

1616746164190_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1616746164190_0.jpeg_w360.jpg

1881 ms

1484275483626_0.jpg

1484275483626_0.jpg

1215 ms

shoppingbag.png

shoppingbag.png

528 ms

big-loupe.svg

big-loupe.svg

186 ms

x.svg

x.svg

184 ms

blank.png

blank.png

504 ms

bag.png

bag.png

677 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

53 ms

js.aspx

js.aspx

127 ms

1616659459652_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1616659459652_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

2703 ms

1616750308418_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1616750308418_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

2048 ms

1598769873926_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1598769873926_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1123 ms

1616661248011_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1616661248011_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

2495 ms

1616742715420_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1616742715420_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

2335 ms

1596533586169_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1596533586169_0.jpg_w1512.jpg

1471 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

59 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

88 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

58 ms

iconfont.ttf

iconfont.ttf

511 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

86 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

57 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

166 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

instagram.css

instagram.css

96 ms

Accessibility Review

luxurylvbag.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

luxurylvbag.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

luxurylvbag.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Luxurylvbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Luxurylvbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

luxurylvbag.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Luxurylvbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: