Tools & Wizards About Us
lwg.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

lwg.de

WITTMANN Recycling & Entsorgung in Landshut und Umgebung

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

316 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

lwg.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lwg.de homepage info - get ready to check Lwg best content right away, or after learning these important things about lwg.de

Wir sind Profis für Entsorgung, Recycling und fachgerechte Verwertung von Wertstoffen aller Art. ✓ Müllentsorgung für Landshut und Umgebung

Visit lwg.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Lwg.de page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lwg.de performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lwg.de

316 ms

www.wittmann-recycling.de

1762 ms

875e9.css

202 ms

66af4.css

314 ms

jquery.min.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lwg.de, 96% (43 requests) were made to Wittmann-recycling.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Wittmann-recycling.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 121.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lwg.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 85.0 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 942.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lwg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 99 B

  • Original 189.7 kB
  • After minification 189.7 kB
  • After compression 189.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 405 B

  • Original 99.3 kB
  • After minification 99.3 kB
  • After compression 98.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lwg.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (20%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lwg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lwg.de

lwg.de

316 ms

www.wittmann-recycling.de

www.wittmann-recycling.de

1762 ms

875e9.css

875e9.css

202 ms

66af4.css

66af4.css

314 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

17 ms

c4bc5.js

c4bc5.js

415 ms

8b93a.js

8b93a.js

333 ms

71919.css

71919.css

425 ms

1f540.js

1f540.js

236 ms

cb6a3.js

cb6a3.js

506 ms

2e137.js

2e137.js

423 ms

8b21c.js

8b21c.js

422 ms

c876c.js

c876c.js

424 ms

3c7ba.js

3c7ba.js

424 ms

wittmann-recycling-logo.svg

wittmann-recycling-logo.svg

107 ms

wittmann-recycling-logo-wei%C3%9F.svg

wittmann-recycling-logo-wei%C3%9F.svg

105 ms

facebook-logo.png

facebook-logo.png

195 ms

viele-abfaelle-eine-loesung-ergolding.png

viele-abfaelle-eine-loesung-ergolding.png

277 ms

textilrecycling-sinnvoll-und-fair.png

textilrecycling-sinnvoll-und-fair.png

278 ms

wittmann-recycling-platzhalter-500x500-1-480x320.jpg

wittmann-recycling-platzhalter-500x500-1-480x320.jpg

207 ms

wittmann-background-green-small.jpg

wittmann-background-green-small.jpg

206 ms

altpapier-wittmann-recycling-Vilsbiburg.svg

altpapier-wittmann-recycling-Vilsbiburg.svg

265 ms

aktenvernichtung-wittmann-recycling-landshut.svg

aktenvernichtung-wittmann-recycling-landshut.svg

278 ms

altmetall-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

altmetall-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

310 ms

gewerbeabfall-wittmann-recycling-altdorf.svg

gewerbeabfall-wittmann-recycling-altdorf.svg

308 ms

sperrmuell-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

sperrmuell-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

367 ms

gruengutt-wittmann-recycling-landshut.svg

gruengutt-wittmann-recycling-landshut.svg

379 ms

folienentsorgung-wittmann-recycling-geisenhausen.svg

folienentsorgung-wittmann-recycling-geisenhausen.svg

383 ms

bauschutt-wittmann-recycling-vilsbiburg.svg

bauschutt-wittmann-recycling-vilsbiburg.svg

381 ms

holzabfall-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

holzabfall-wittmann-recycling-ergolding.svg

410 ms

cb-maps.png

cb-maps.png

410 ms

wittmann-footer-background.jpg

wittmann-footer-background.jpg

469 ms

zertifikat-bvse-logo-wittmann-recycling.png

zertifikat-bvse-logo-wittmann-recycling.png

581 ms

Logo_Textilrecycling_claim-unten_rgb.png

Logo_Textilrecycling_claim-unten_rgb.png

481 ms

Ueberwachungzeichen-wittmann-entsorgungsbetrieb.png

Ueberwachungzeichen-wittmann-entsorgungsbetrieb.png

582 ms

zertifikat-bvse-qualitaetssiegel-wittmann-recycling.png

zertifikat-bvse-qualitaetssiegel-wittmann-recycling.png

613 ms

Logo_LOGEX_Systempartner_RGB.jpg

Logo_LOGEX_Systempartner_RGB.jpg

612 ms

zertifikat-vbs-logo-wittmann-recycling.png

zertifikat-vbs-logo-wittmann-recycling.png

571 ms

EuRIC-Textiles-Logo-RGB.png

EuRIC-Textiles-Logo-RGB.png

783 ms

BIR-Membership-Certificate-LWG.png

BIR-Membership-Certificate-LWG.png

971 ms

Zertifikta_Logo_Pueg.png

Zertifikta_Logo_Pueg.png

782 ms

schraege.svg

schraege.svg

685 ms

muli-v11-latin-300.woff

muli-v11-latin-300.woff

640 ms

muli-v11-latin-600.woff

muli-v11-latin-600.woff

639 ms

muli-v11-latin-700.woff

muli-v11-latin-700.woff

712 ms

Accessibility Review

lwg.de accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

lwg.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lwg.de SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lwg.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lwg.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lwg.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lwg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: