Tools & Wizards About Us
richmond.lewisseo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

richmond.lewisseo.com

Lewis SEO Company Award Winning High ROI SEO Programs

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

137 ms

richmond.lewisseo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit richmond.lewisseo.com now to see the best up-to-date Richmond Lewis SEO content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richmond.lewisseo.com

Lewis SEO Company has been serving businesses of all sizes since 2008. We deliver top results, we would like to show you how.

Visit richmond.lewisseo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richmond.lewisseo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richmond.lewisseo.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richmond.lewisseo.com

22 ms

richmond.lewisseo.com

54 ms

lewisseo.com

1125 ms

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Richmond.lewisseo.com, 46% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 21% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.ampproject.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

414.2 kB

After Optimization

274.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Richmond.lewisseo.com main page is 414.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 301.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 94.2 kB

  • Original 112.9 kB
  • After minification 102.9 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 45.8 kB

  • Original 301.3 kB
  • After minification 301.3 kB
  • After compression 255.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (80%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richmond Lewis SEO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richmond.lewisseo.com

richmond.lewisseo.com

22 ms

richmond.lewisseo.com

richmond.lewisseo.com

54 ms

lewisseo.com

lewisseo.com

1125 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

css

css

37 ms

v0.js

v0.js

60 ms

amp-position-observer-0.1.js

amp-position-observer-0.1.js

1481 ms

amp-bind-0.1.js

amp-bind-0.1.js

1546 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

1546 ms

amp-animation-0.1.js

amp-animation-0.1.js

1545 ms

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

amp-lightbox-0.1.js

1546 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

amp-form-0.1.js

1546 ms

amp-mustache-0.2.js

amp-mustache-0.2.js

1544 ms

amp-lightbox-gallery-0.1.js

amp-lightbox-gallery-0.1.js

1610 ms

amp-image-lightbox-0.1.js

amp-image-lightbox-0.1.js

1610 ms

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

1610 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

38 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

1491 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

1529 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

1556 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

1556 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

1557 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

59 ms

UIVWHN7RWJCTPKNUBOY66V

UIVWHN7RWJCTPKNUBOY66V

51 ms

Accessibility Review

richmond.lewisseo.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

richmond.lewisseo.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

richmond.lewisseo.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmond.lewisseo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richmond.lewisseo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richmond.lewisseo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richmond Lewis SEO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: