Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

voyage.linternaute.com

Voyage : guides de voyage, destinations vacances et conseils

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

314 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

965 ms

voyage.linternaute.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Voyage Linternaute content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about voyage.linternaute.com

Préparez vos vacances à l'étranger, consultez nos guides de voyage, posez vos questions dans le forum Voyage, trouvez des bons plans et conseils.

Visit voyage.linternaute.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Voyage.linternaute.com page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

voyage.linternaute.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,140 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

voyage.linternaute.com

314 ms

879 ms

polyfill.css

38 ms

linternaute.69f57bd92f1686d52543.css

77 ms

linternaute_home.4bb263f66ebdfd2c1829.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Voyage.linternaute.com, 42% (20 requests) were made to Astatic.ccmbg.com and 38% (18 requests) were made to Img-4.linternaute.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (879 ms) relates to the external source Linternaute.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 476.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Voyage.linternaute.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 92.8 kB

  • Original 115.9 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 994 B

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Voyage Linternaute images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 339.9 kB

  • Original 510.5 kB
  • After minification 510.4 kB
  • After compression 170.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 339.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 165.8 kB
  • After minification 165.6 kB
  • After compression 122.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Voyage.linternaute.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (9%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Voyage Linternaute. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

voyage.linternaute.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

voyage.linternaute.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

voyage.linternaute.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Voyage.linternaute.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Voyage.linternaute.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Voyage Linternaute. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: