Access magicjack.ca. Erfahre mehr über uns | getquin

magicjack.ca screenshot

64

Performance

Renders faster than
77% of other websites
90

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 74% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
86

SEO

Google-friendlier than
60% of websites

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

807 ms

magicjack.ca screenshot

About Website

Welcome to magicjack.ca homepage info - get ready to check Magicjack best content right away, or after learning these important things about magicjack.ca

Empowering people to become better investors. Das ist unsere Mission! Erfahre mehr über die Menschen hinter der App.

Visit magicjack.ca

Key Findings

We analyzed Magicjack.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.139

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

CdVTvk

27 ms

magicJackGO.html

193 ms

magicJack.js

168 ms

bootstrap.min.css

191 ms

style.compiled.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Magicjack.ca, 9% (11 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) relates to the external source Magicjack.com.

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Magicjack.ca main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

Original 41.3 kB
After minification 32.3 kB
After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 988.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magicjack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 491.8 kB

Original 760.7 kB
After minification 732.0 kB
After compression 268.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 491.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 727.1 kB

Original 980.1 kB
After minification 855.5 kB
After compression 253.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magicjack.ca needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 727.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magicjack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magicjack.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Magicjack.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

magicjack.ca

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Magicjack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: