Tools & Wizards About Us
mastering.lt screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mastering.lt

MASTERING.LT Professional Audio Mastering and Mixing Studio in Rotterdam

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

750 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

174 ms

mastering.lt screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing MASTERING content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mastering.lt

Professional online audio mastering and mixing studio, experienced mastering and mixing engineer. Our quality is better than price.

Visit mastering.lt

Key Findings

We analyzed Mastering.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 750 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mastering.lt performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mastering.lt

750 ms

styles_20150521120625.min.css

131 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

footer_scripts_20150521120625.min.js

353 ms

css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Mastering.lt, 14% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) belongs to the original domain Mastering.lt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.6 kB (1%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mastering.lt main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MASTERING images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 340 B

  • Original 81.4 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 81.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mastering.lt has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MASTERING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mastering.lt

mastering.lt

750 ms

styles_20150521120625.min.css

styles_20150521120625.min.css

131 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

footer_scripts_20150521120625.min.js

footer_scripts_20150521120625.min.js

353 ms

css

css

19 ms

mastering_20150521120625.png

mastering_20150521120625.png

133 ms

placeholder_splash_clients.png

placeholder_splash_clients.png

241 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xw.ttf

8 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

17 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkKEo58a-xw.ttf

17 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

14 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

373 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

347 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

496 ms

04.jpg

04.jpg

556 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

693 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

578 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

472 ms

08.jpg

08.jpg

619 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

js

js

60 ms

Accessibility Review

mastering.lt accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mastering.lt best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mastering.lt SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mastering.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mastering.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mastering.lt

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MASTERING. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: