Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

math.tools

Math Tools

Page Load Speed

435 ms in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

344 ms

Page Rendered

82 ms

math.tools screenshot

About Website

Welcome to math.tools homepage info - get ready to check Math best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about math.tools

All the tools and references you need for your math wiz

Visit math.tools

Key Findings

We analyzed Math.tools page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 426 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

math.tools performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,550 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.423

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

math.tools

9 ms

math.tools

26 ms

bootstrap.min.css

21 ms

font-awesome.min.css

39 ms

AdminLTE.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Math.tools, 21% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (194 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

272.9 kB

After Optimization

216.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Math.tools main page is 272.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 163.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 55.5 kB

  • Original 62.9 kB
  • After minification 48.6 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Math images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 964 B

  • Original 163.2 kB
  • After minification 163.2 kB
  • After compression 162.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 162 B

  • Original 39.3 kB
  • After minification 39.3 kB
  • After compression 39.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Math.tools has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (75%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Math. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

math.tools accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

math.tools best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

math.tools SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Math.tools can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Math.tools main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: