4.6 sec in total
221 ms
3.9 sec
499 ms
Visit medengine.fi now to see the best up-to-date Med Engine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medengine.fi
Thrive in your global medical business with science-based tools, knowledge, and support from MedEngine. Enhance your success today.
Visit medengine.fiWe analyzed Medengine.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
medengine.fi performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
221 ms
593 ms
97 ms
43 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Medengine.fi, 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Medengine.fi.
Page size can be reduced by 519.2 kB (22%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Medengine.fi main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 425.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Med Engine needs image optimization as it can save up to 425.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medengine.fi has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (67%)
78
26
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Med Engine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
medengine.fi
221 ms
www.medengine.fi
593 ms
gtm.js
97 ms
script.js
43 ms
style.min.css
130 ms
styles.css
190 ms
nectar-slider.css
260 ms
uaf.css
263 ms
if-menu-site.css
263 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
270 ms
style.css
275 ms
grid-system.css
276 ms
style.css
437 ms
header-layout-centered-menu-under-logo.css
351 ms
element-post-grid.css
353 ms
element-clients.css
359 ms
caroufredsel.css
361 ms
asset-reveal-animation.css
366 ms
cf7.css
449 ms
css
91 ms
responsive.css
450 ms
select2.css
452 ms
skin-original.css
454 ms
menu-dynamic.css
456 ms
js_composer.min.css
521 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
615 ms
style.css
528 ms
css
89 ms
jquery.min.js
628 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
541 ms
animate.min.css
544 ms
yikes-inc-easy-mailchimp-extender-public.min.css
604 ms
style-non-critical.css
626 ms
magnific.css
702 ms
core.css
703 ms
slide-out-right-hover.css
706 ms
index.js
707 ms
index.js
708 ms
anime.min.js
796 ms
nectar-slider.js
867 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
797 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
796 ms
log
423 ms
priority.js
647 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
618 ms
transit.min.js
613 ms
waypoints.js
614 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
613 ms
hoverintent.min.js
644 ms
magnific.js
642 ms
touchswipe.min.js
645 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
572 ms
superfish.js
569 ms
init.js
694 ms
select2.min.js
624 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
620 ms
form-submission-helpers.min.js
564 ms
MedEngine-a-VCLS-Company-Logo-retina.png
353 ms
Pfizer_Logo_Black_RGB.png
530 ms
Takeda.png
417 ms
pierre_fabre_medicament.png
417 ms
sooma.png
446 ms
Teva_logo-2019_web.png
447 ms
medix_logo.png
480 ms
novartis_logo_pos_rgb.png
490 ms
janssen-1.png
578 ms
Bayer.png
531 ms
THL_logo_web3.png
533 ms
gsk_black-1.png
565 ms
Zora_logo.png
531 ms
BpG_logo3.png
570 ms
Aiforia_logo.png
574 ms
Orion.png
572 ms
HCH.png
596 ms
BI_logo_Black.png
521 ms
BuFi.png
521 ms
Logo_White.png
562 ms
ME-Bannerkuva_Versio-06.jpg
1017 ms
MedEngine.jpg
932 ms
89A8513_final.jpg
694 ms
180410120907Atlas-Regular.woff
537 ms
180410120954Paciencia-Regular.woff
633 ms
icomoon.woff
582 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
77 ms
180410120831Atlas-Bold.woff
622 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
825 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
92 ms
medengine.fi accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
medengine.fi best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
medengine.fi SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medengine.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medengine.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
medengine.fi
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Med Engine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: