Tools & Wizards About Us
mettl.pro screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

mettl.pro

Mercer | Mettl: Best Online Talent Assessment Company - Assessments, Platform, and Proctoring

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

402 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

331 ms

mettl.pro screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mettl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mettl.pro

Online assessments made easy with Mercer | Mettl's virtual talent assessment tools. Best remote assessment company to conduct organizational and employee talent mapping, management, and acquisition - ...

Visit mettl.pro

Key Findings

We analyzed Mettl.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 402 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mettl.pro performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,710 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.275

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mettl.pro

402 ms

mettl.pro

2451 ms

gtm.js

143 ms

jQuery.js

647 ms

iframeApi.js

713 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Mettl.pro, 13% (4 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Mettl.pro.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (83%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

279.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Mettl.pro main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 92% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 848 B

  • Original 161.9 kB
  • After minification 161.9 kB
  • After compression 161.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (85%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mettl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mettl.pro

mettl.pro

402 ms

mettl.pro

mettl.pro

2451 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

143 ms

jQuery.js

jQuery.js

647 ms

iframeApi.js

iframeApi.js

713 ms

j.php

j.php

42 ms

3ffc6e3908cc7d43.css

3ffc6e3908cc7d43.css

660 ms

7af69d0ccad4db60.css

7af69d0ccad4db60.css

660 ms

polyfills-0d1b80a048d4787e.js

polyfills-0d1b80a048d4787e.js

857 ms

webpack-f566cde6a166dd81.js

webpack-f566cde6a166dd81.js

712 ms

main-c9dedbd70e0d127d.js

main-c9dedbd70e0d127d.js

1254 ms

2554-1777d17c1432ec0c.js

2554-1777d17c1432ec0c.js

1292 ms

_app-7deddfa461175e8d.js

_app-7deddfa461175e8d.js

1140 ms

mui-6e7023f22e82ce44.js

mui-6e7023f22e82ce44.js

1732 ms

5876-279de2caec6258b4.js

5876-279de2caec6258b4.js

1570 ms

1239-ddfbecc977fd9cdd.js

1239-ddfbecc977fd9cdd.js

1249 ms

4460-71b5ea4a2e523dfe.js

4460-71b5ea4a2e523dfe.js

1423 ms

7110-6184caf33d595bf3.js

7110-6184caf33d595bf3.js

1552 ms

4210-041bc53661fa267d.js

4210-041bc53661fa267d.js

1632 ms

5961-66039b12b09139be.js

5961-66039b12b09139be.js

1637 ms

240-5651acb72a24d4eb.js

240-5651acb72a24d4eb.js

1696 ms

1412-5e15b3605b5554cf.js

1412-5e15b3605b5554cf.js

1806 ms

index-d579861040d0b5ed.js

index-d579861040d0b5ed.js

1846 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

1951 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

1960 ms

v.gif

v.gif

15 ms

va-08379131e112fc318c9ae196d23b5864gz.js

va-08379131e112fc318c9ae196d23b5864gz.js

6 ms

settings.js

settings.js

345 ms

lato.woff2

lato.woff2

1269 ms

montserrat.woff2

montserrat.woff2

1309 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

97 ms

Accessibility Review

mettl.pro accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

mettl.pro best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mettl.pro SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mettl.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mettl.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mettl.pro

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mettl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: