Tools & Wizards About Us
microfastenings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

microfastenings.com

Micro Fastenings – Small Screws Is All That We Do

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

170 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

323 ms

microfastenings.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to microfastenings.com homepage info - get ready to check Micro Fastenings best content right away, or after learning these important things about microfastenings.com

Visit microfastenings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Microfastenings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 170 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microfastenings.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

microfastenings.com

170 ms

www.microfastenings.com

468 ms

llx2xel.css

241 ms

main.min.css

84 ms

frontend.css

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Microfastenings.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (884 ms) belongs to the original domain Microfastenings.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 391.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Microfastenings.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 133.6 kB

  • Original 158.6 kB
  • After minification 156.3 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 240.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 867.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Micro Fastenings needs image optimization as it can save up to 240.1 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 155.4 kB
  • After minification 155.4 kB
  • After compression 138.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micro Fastenings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

microfastenings.com

microfastenings.com

170 ms

www.microfastenings.com

www.microfastenings.com

468 ms

llx2xel.css

llx2xel.css

241 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

84 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

164 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

326 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

247 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

246 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

248 ms

nicons.css

nicons.css

251 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

340 ms

global.css

global.css

330 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

332 ms

post-17.css

post-17.css

332 ms

post-59.css

post-59.css

334 ms

css

css

29 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

405 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

460 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

488 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

460 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

460 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

460 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

484 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

503 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

503 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

503 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

509 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

564 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

570 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

576 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

576 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

24 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

595 ms

parallax-gallery.min.js

parallax-gallery.min.js

595 ms

hotips.min.js

hotips.min.js

644 ms

MF-LogoTriangle.png

MF-LogoTriangle.png

654 ms

Large-Pan-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Large-Pan-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

736 ms

Small-CSK-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Small-CSK-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

818 ms

Thin-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Thin-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

829 ms

Large-Pan-Head-TRI-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Large-Pan-Head-TRI-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

758 ms

Small-CSK-Head-TR-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Small-CSK-Head-TR-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

884 ms

Thin-Head-TRI-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Thin-Head-TRI-MET-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

742 ms

Large-Pan-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Large-Pan-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

660 ms

p.css

p.css

19 ms

Small-CSK-Head-TR-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Small-CSK-Head-TR-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

688 ms

Thin-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1-1024x576.png

Thin-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1-1024x576.png

740 ms

Small-Pan-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

Small-Pan-Head-Machined-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1024x576.png

741 ms

Small-Pan-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1-1024x576.png

Small-Pan-Head-TRI-PLAS-M2-x-6-Lg-2-1-1024x576.png

657 ms

d

d

14 ms

d

d

9 ms

Accessibility Review

microfastenings.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

microfastenings.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

microfastenings.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microfastenings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microfastenings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

microfastenings.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Micro Fastenings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: