Tools & Wizards About Us
milesoft.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

milesoft.net

Milesoft Software Technologies - Solutions that work

Page Load Speed

17 sec in total

First Response

120 ms

Resources Loaded

16.7 sec

Page Rendered

148 ms

milesoft.net screenshot

About Website

Visit milesoft.net now to see the best up-to-date Milesoft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about milesoft.net

Milesoft is a well known name in industries – for software needs in and around Nashik. We have a proven track record in creating software that works to enhance business processes. Providing applicatio...

Visit milesoft.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Milesoft.net page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 16.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

milesoft.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

milesoft.net

120 ms

milesoft.net

16351 ms

style.css

58 ms

style.min.css

101 ms

styles.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Milesoft.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Milesoft.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 449.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

887.5 kB

After Optimization

438.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Milesoft.net main page is 887.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 315.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 32.2 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 269.1 kB
  • After minification 260.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Milesoft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 174.7 kB

  • Original 270.3 kB
  • After minification 264.8 kB
  • After compression 95.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 240.8 kB

  • Original 315.8 kB
  • After minification 297.1 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Milesoft.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 240.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Milesoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

milesoft.net

milesoft.net

120 ms

milesoft.net

milesoft.net

16351 ms

style.css

style.css

58 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

101 ms

styles.css

styles.css

64 ms

all.css

all.css

34 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

43 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

78 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

94 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

67 ms

include.js

include.js

85 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

68 ms

flickity.css

flickity.css

53 ms

icons.css

icons.css

143 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

151 ms

index.js

index.js

149 ms

index.js

index.js

150 ms

flickity.js

flickity.js

151 ms

index.js

index.js

155 ms

drone.js

drone.js

155 ms

ga.js

ga.js

67 ms

lights-web-background.jpg

lights-web-background.jpg

59 ms

glyphicons-halflings.png

glyphicons-halflings.png

59 ms

works-head-bg.png

works-head-bg.png

58 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

73 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

58 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

86 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

82 ms

quote.png

quote.png

81 ms

adventure_subtitles-webfont.woff

adventure_subtitles-webfont.woff

29 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

47 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

milesoft.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

milesoft.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

milesoft.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Milesoft.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Milesoft.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

milesoft.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Milesoft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: