Tools & Wizards About Us
mindkeeper.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

mindkeeper.net

Mind Keeper

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

5.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

mindkeeper.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mind Keeper content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mindkeeper.net

Mindkeeper Solutions develops high-end applications with the back-end functionality that makes business on the Web as easy for the end user as well as for the owner all by using the latest technologie...

Visit mindkeeper.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mindkeeper.net page load time and found that the first response time was 5.1 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mindkeeper.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mindkeeper.net

5104 ms

flash_display.js

172 ms

urchin.js

8 ms

styles.css

248 ms

__utm.gif

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Mindkeeper.net, 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Img.constantcontact.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Mindkeeper.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.9 kB (67%)

Content Size

37.4 kB

After Optimization

12.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mindkeeper.net main page is 37.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 23.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 22.2 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mindkeeper.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mind Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mindkeeper.net

mindkeeper.net

5104 ms

flash_display.js

flash_display.js

172 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

8 ms

styles.css

styles.css

248 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

3 ms

topBG.gif

topBG.gif

106 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

196 ms

email2_trans.gif

email2_trans.gif

33 ms

cart.gif

cart.gif

94 ms

roundrect712532507.gif

roundrect712532507.gif

166 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

96 ms

bullet.gif

bullet.gif

202 ms

designPlanFrame.gif

designPlanFrame.gif

274 ms

roundrect712532508.gif

roundrect712532508.gif

282 ms

dlButton.gif

dlButton.gif

283 ms

roundrect22256112.gif

roundrect22256112.gif

285 ms

roundrect22265195.gif

roundrect22265195.gif

321 ms

Accessibility Review

mindkeeper.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

mindkeeper.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

mindkeeper.net SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mindkeeper.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mindkeeper.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

mindkeeper.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mind Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: