Tools & Wizards About Us
mineraldesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

mineraldesign.com

Terrazzo custom sinks & furniture in Terrazzo | Mosaic Factory

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

343 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

mineraldesign.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mineraldesign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mineraldesign.com

Made-to-order worktops, sinks, basins and tables in fully customizable Terrazzo | Factory in Tangier, showroom in London.

Visit mineraldesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mineraldesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mineraldesign.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

mineraldesign.com

343 ms

138 ms

raz2ijv.css

95 ms

visage.css

113 ms

slick.css

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Mineraldesign.com, 15% (13 requests) were made to Mosaicfactory.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Carreaux-terrazzo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 748.1 kB (78%)

Content Size

961.1 kB

After Optimization

213.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mineraldesign.com main page is 961.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 872.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 16.3 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 673.5 kB

  • Original 872.2 kB
  • After minification 623.3 kB
  • After compression 198.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 673.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mineraldesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (39%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mineraldesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mineraldesign.com

mineraldesign.com

343 ms

138 ms

raz2ijv.css

raz2ijv.css

95 ms

visage.css

visage.css

113 ms

slick.css

slick.css

225 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

322 ms

style.css

style.css

558 ms

js

js

67 ms

widgets.min.js

widgets.min.js

404 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

780 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

1548 ms

jquery.popupoverlay.js

jquery.popupoverlay.js

437 ms

jquery.visage.js

jquery.visage.js

437 ms

slick.js

slick.js

621 ms

index_page.js

index_page.js

336 ms

p.css

p.css

33 ms

gosamples.svg

gosamples.svg

592 ms

MOSAIC%20FACTORY.svg

MOSAIC%20FACTORY.svg

114 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

120 ms

MINERALDESIGN.svg

MINERALDESIGN.svg

112 ms

menu_close.svg

menu_close.svg

116 ms

menu_hamburg.svg

menu_hamburg.svg

117 ms

out_white.svg

out_white.svg

117 ms

Instagram.svg

Instagram.svg

249 ms

Youtube.svg

Youtube.svg

239 ms

Pinterest.svg

Pinterest.svg

247 ms

LinkedIn.svg

LinkedIn.svg

238 ms

UK.svg

UK.svg

250 ms

FR.svg

FR.svg

247 ms

DE.svg

DE.svg

358 ms

NL.svg

NL.svg

353 ms

ES.svg

ES.svg

375 ms

IT.svg

IT.svg

377 ms

PT.svg

PT.svg

1006 ms

1.webp

1.webp

484 ms

2.webp

2.webp

569 ms

3.webp

3.webp

583 ms

4.webp

4.webp

619 ms

5.webp

5.webp

595 ms

6.webp

6.webp

711 ms

7.webp

7.webp

685 ms

8.webp

8.webp

807 ms

9.webp

9.webp

1023 ms

10.webp

10.webp

740 ms

11.webp

11.webp

1002 ms

12-2.webp

12-2.webp

831 ms

12-1.webp

12-1.webp

866 ms

13.webp

13.webp

928 ms

14.webp

14.webp

970 ms

15.webp

15.webp

994 ms

16.webp

16.webp

1047 ms

603 ms

17.webp

17.webp

1061 ms

18.webp

18.webp

1102 ms

d

d

16 ms

d

d

11 ms

d

d

14 ms

d

d

85 ms

19.webp

19.webp

1026 ms

20.webp

20.webp

1020 ms

21.webp

21.webp

1033 ms

Choose%20your%20colours.webp

Choose%20your%20colours.webp

1049 ms

Instagram.svg

Instagram.svg

1070 ms

Youtube.svg

Youtube.svg

1130 ms

Pinterest.svg

Pinterest.svg

1014 ms

LinkedIn.svg

LinkedIn.svg

1016 ms

slick.css

slick.css

128 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

253 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

560 ms

slick.js

slick.js

532 ms

5383.js

5383.js

18 ms

5383.js

5383.js

370 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

314 ms

mineraldesign.com.json

mineraldesign.com.json

49 ms

84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js

84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js

11 ms

89.webp

89.webp

357 ms

88.webp

88.webp

273 ms

87.webp

87.webp

271 ms

86.webp

86.webp

574 ms

85.webp

85.webp

571 ms

84.webp

84.webp

484 ms

prev.svg

prev.svg

355 ms

next.svg

next.svg

390 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

388 ms

SEO Factors

mineraldesign.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mineraldesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mineraldesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mineraldesign.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mineraldesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: