5.4 sec in total
473 ms
4.6 sec
355 ms
Visit mirt.ru now to see the best up-to-date Mirt content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mirt.ru
Христианский центр "Мирт" – это книги для думающих людей, которые стремятся формировать свои убеждения в соответствии со Священным Писанием, и евангельская газета «Мирт» для верующих евангельских церк...
Visit mirt.ruWe analyzed Mirt.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 473 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
mirt.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value2,330 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.301
39/100
15%
Value33.3 s
0/100
10%
473 ms
835 ms
275 ms
541 ms
546 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Mirt.ru, 4% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mirt.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 805.4 kB (20%)
4.1 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Mirt.ru main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 272.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 141.2 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 272.7 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 529.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mirt needs image optimization as it can save up to 529.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 169 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirt.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (25%)
64
48
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mirt.ru
473 ms
mirt.ru
835 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
275 ms
yourshop.min.css
541 ms
yourshop.min.js
546 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
404 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
408 ms
jquery.countdownTimer.min.js
407 ms
yourshop.shop.min.css
411 ms
yourshop.shop.min.js
540 ms
pattern.png
135 ms
logo.png
135 ms
bx_loader.gif
136 ms
15.jpg
136 ms
16.jpg
136 ms
17.jpg
148 ms
18.jpg
268 ms
20.jpg
805 ms
21.png
1083 ms
2493.200x0.png
404 ms
quick_view.png
269 ms
471.200x0.jpg
271 ms
2540.200x0.png
403 ms
2602.200x0.png
670 ms
2606.200x0.png
538 ms
2200.200x0.jpg
537 ms
2608.200x0.png
538 ms
2611.200x0.png
806 ms
2613.200x0.png
807 ms
2617.200x0.png
673 ms
500.200x0.jpg
814 ms
632.200x0.jpg
810 ms
616.200x0.jpg
940 ms
504.200x0.jpg
941 ms
507.200x0.jpg
942 ms
633.200x0.jpg
944 ms
628.200x0.jpg
950 ms
636.200x0.jpg
1074 ms
736.200x0.jpg
1076 ms
750.200x0.jpg
1077 ms
1093.200x0.jpg
1079 ms
1106.200x0.jpg
1084 ms
627.200x0.jpg
1209 ms
1580.200x0.jpg
1210 ms
image1.jpg
1212 ms
tag.js
953 ms
image2.jpg
1198 ms
css
61 ms
fontface.css
1085 ms
yourshop-icons.min.css
1089 ms
image3.png
1225 ms
tinkoff.png
1225 ms
loading16.gif
1214 ms
arrows.png
1214 ms
81.900x300.png
1222 ms
73.970x0.jpg
1176 ms
77.970x377.jpg
1158 ms
advert.gif
694 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
22 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
198 ms
yourshop.ttf
191 ms
alsrubl-arial-bold.woff
196 ms
alsrubl-arial-regular.woff
323 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
142 ms
onload.js
139 ms
onload.js
138 ms
jquery.retina.min.js
135 ms
lazy.load.js
135 ms
lazyloading.min.js
183 ms
1
145 ms
openapi.c340c125c61ec5745ebb2a98626e46ab.js
252 ms
mirt.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mirt.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mirt.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirt.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mirt.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mirt.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mirt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: