4 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.4 sec
56 ms
Visit mm-pop.com now to see the best up-to-date Mm POP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mm-pop.com
Large format screen and digital printing solutions source, Creating Retail Graphics and Displays for over 75 years.
Visit mm-pop.comWe analyzed Mm-pop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
mm-pop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value4.9 s
64/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
1632 ms
32 ms
30 ms
62 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mm-pop.com, 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com and 28% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Mmprintsolutions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 578.3 kB (56%)
1.0 MB
448.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Mm-pop.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 661.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 521.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 521.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mm POP needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mm POP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mmprintsolutions.com
1632 ms
minified.js
32 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
30 ms
polyfill.min.js
62 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js
45 ms
main.317ed945.bundle.min.js
111 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
15 ms
lodash.min.js
47 ms
react.production.min.js
46 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
47 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
109 ms
MM%20New%20Logo%20White.png
65 ms
bundle.min.js
56 ms
f2fc09_3e3dd7637f0b45a696e1d8de8efd4b87f000.jpg
181 ms
Large%20Format%20Printing.png
206 ms
POP%20Displays.png
271 ms
Print%20Management.png
426 ms
f2fc09_8a6cf6bdf92c40059e397000a684f91a~mv2_d_6000_4001_s_4_2.jpg
287 ms
f2fc09_cd735d7682a3423883acb5a06e0b71a3~mv2.jpg
284 ms
PrintSampleBook.png
389 ms
g7master_seal.png
209 ms
logo%20(1).png
212 ms
MM%2520Premiums_edited.jpg
412 ms
101 ms
101 ms
97 ms
97 ms
96 ms
96 ms
119 ms
126 ms
129 ms
123 ms
125 ms
127 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
20 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
mm-pop.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
mm-pop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
mm-pop.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mm-pop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mm-pop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mm-pop.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mm POP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: