Tools & Wizards About Us
mole-patrol.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

mole-patrol.com

The Mole Patrol | The Mole Patrol | Puget Sound, Washington

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

794 ms

Page Rendered

281 ms

mole-patrol.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mole-patrol.com homepage info - get ready to check Mole Patrol best content right away, or after learning these important things about mole-patrol.com

When we've successfully neutralized your ground mole problem, we leave you with a mole-free property that is covered by a 3-month limited warranty.

Visit mole-patrol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mole-patrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mole-patrol.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mole-patrol.com

62 ms

www.mole-patrol.com

9 ms

www.mole-patrol.com

173 ms

module.css

13 ms

app.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Mole-patrol.com, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (257 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 550.5 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

728.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mole-patrol.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 18.0 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 471.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 551.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mole Patrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 471.1 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 157.3 kB
  • After minification 157.3 kB
  • After compression 143.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 79.0 kB
  • After minification 79.0 kB
  • After compression 27.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mole-patrol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (24%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mole Patrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mole-patrol.com

mole-patrol.com

62 ms

www.mole-patrol.com

www.mole-patrol.com

9 ms

www.mole-patrol.com

www.mole-patrol.com

173 ms

module.css

module.css

13 ms

app.css

app.css

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

20 ms

efelle.js

efelle.js

48 ms

module.js

module.js

48 ms

css

css

32 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

257 ms

molepatrol-logo.png

molepatrol-logo.png

249 ms

login_facebook.js

login_facebook.js

228 ms

homepage-masthead.jpg

homepage-masthead.jpg

48 ms

service.png

service.png

41 ms

37-off--1-1-1466038238.png

37-off--1-1-1466038238.png

19 ms

38-off--1-1-1466038221.png

38-off--1-1-1466038221.png

20 ms

39-off--1-1-1466038205.png

39-off--1-1-1466038205.png

61 ms

14-off-formrequest-for-service-1465862246.png

14-off-formrequest-for-service-1465862246.png

110 ms

15-off-formreporting-new-activity-1465862288.png

15-off-formreporting-new-activity-1465862288.png

141 ms

service_moreinfo_bg.jpg

service_moreinfo_bg.jpg

156 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

72 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

42 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

65 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

91 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

105 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

85 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

90 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

155 ms

Glyphter.woff

Glyphter.woff

109 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

140 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

50 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

js

js

126 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

mole-patrol.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mole-patrol.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mole-patrol.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mole-patrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mole-patrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mole-patrol.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mole Patrol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: