Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

moo-directory.com

The Moo Web Directory - Human Edited Website and Business Directory now offering Website Reviews

Page Load Speed

21.6 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

21.2 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

moo-directory.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Moo Directory content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about moo-directory.com

The Moo Web Directory is a human edited web directory of websites ensuring only the best quality, content rich and most relevant sites are included.

Visit moo-directory.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Moo-directory.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 21.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 5 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

moo-directory.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,380 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

moo-directory.com

197 ms

www.moo-directory.com

391 ms

css_browser_selector.js

222 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

190 ms

jquery-1.8.3.js

743 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Moo-directory.com, 22% (20 requests) were made to Api.thumbnail.ws and 8% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Api.thumbnail.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 474.7 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

577.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Moo-directory.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 565.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 116.4 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 129.9 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 98.4 kB

  • Original 326.4 kB
  • After minification 228.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Moo Directory needs image optimization as it can save up to 98.4 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 243.8 kB

  • Original 565.2 kB
  • After minification 437.7 kB
  • After compression 321.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.8 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 19.3 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moo-directory.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (59%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moo Directory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

moo-directory.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

moo-directory.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

moo-directory.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moo-directory.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Moo-directory.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moo Directory. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: