Access mussiclovers.com. Old,Vintage Music Systems Electronics & Vinyl Records Sale India

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

www.mussiclovers.com

685 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

29 ms

style.min.css

68 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

44 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Mussiclovers.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) belongs to the original domain Mussiclovers.com.

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Mussiclovers.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 121.5 kB

Original 146.9 kB
After minification 140.6 kB
After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mussiclovers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 90.6 kB

Original 893.4 kB
After minification 893.4 kB
After compression 802.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

Original 143.6 kB
After minification 143.3 kB
After compression 86.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mussiclovers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mussiclovers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mussiclovers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mussiclovers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mussiclovers.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mussiclovers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Old,Vintage Music Systems Electronics & Vinyl Records Sale India

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

www.mussiclovers.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

style.min.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

www.mussiclovers.com

wp-emoji-release.min.js

style.min.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

shortcodes.css

classic-themes.min.css

styles.css

nivo-lightbox.css

default.css

jquery-ui.css

style-front-end.css

fl-icons.css

flatsome.css

flatsome-shop.css

style.css

css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

script.js

front-end.js

accounting.min.js

selectWoo.full.min.js

yith-wcan-shortcodes.min.js

index.js

index.js

core.min.js

mouse.min.js

slider.min.js

sortable.min.js

effect.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

api.js

flatsome-live-search.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

index.js

hoverIntent.min.js