6.2 sec in total
1 sec
2.6 sec
2.5 sec
Click here to check amazing My Fx Review content for South Africa. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about myfxreview.com
COMPARE THE 2022 BEST FOREX BROKERS Submit Website MT4 Brokers Low Spread Brokers Top Forex Platforms High Leverage Brokers Low Commission Brokers Automated Trading Platforms Top Brokers Rev...
Visit myfxreview.comWe analyzed Myfxreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
myfxreview.com performance score
1046 ms
241 ms
235 ms
235 ms
236 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Myfxreview.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Lessbuttons.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Myfxreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 367.1 kB (42%)
882.3 kB
515.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Myfxreview.com main page is 882.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 438.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, My Fx Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 189.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myfxreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (63%)
59
22
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of My Fx Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
myfxreview.com
1046 ms
screen.css
241 ms
primary-menu.css
235 ms
secondary-menu.css
235 ms
jd.gallery.css
236 ms
mootools-1.2.1-core-yc.js
367 ms
mootools-1.2-more.js
247 ms
jd.gallery.js
409 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.js
411 ms
style.css
410 ms
wpfp.css
410 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
437 ms
jquery.js
613 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
482 ms
superfish.js
485 ms
wpfp.js
482 ms
style-widgets.css
482 ms
script.js
621 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
399 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
166 ms
background.png
410 ms
header-background.png
409 ms
logo.png
410 ms
secondary-menu-bg.png
404 ms
1.jpg
413 ms
2.jpg
414 ms
3.jpg
473 ms
4.jpg
473 ms
5.jpg
415 ms
time.png
411 ms
author.png
415 ms
cat.png
416 ms
EURJPYcMonthly1.png
594 ms
EURJPYcWeekly-1024x358.png
740 ms
search.png
506 ms
post-background.png
484 ms
comments.gif
570 ms
readmore_arrow.png
570 ms
sidebar-tab.png
605 ms
arrow.png
617 ms
footer-background.png
682 ms
counter.js
11 ms
t.php
311 ms
1f609.png
122 ms
loading-bar-black.gif
307 ms
prev.gif
307 ms
next.gif
348 ms
resizer.php
379 ms
resizer.php
442 ms
resizer.php
443 ms
resizer.php
441 ms
resizer.php
477 ms
secondary-menu-arrows.png
470 ms
fastbutton
105 ms
http%3A%2F%2Fmyfxreview.com%2F
147 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
30 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
42 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
38 ms
setcounter.php
177 ms
print.css
123 ms
myfxreview.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myfxreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Myfxreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
myfxreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of My Fx Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: