Tools & Wizards About Us
myrtlebeachtours.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

myrtlebeachtours.com

Student Group Vacation Packages | Myrtle Beach Tours

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

964 ms

myrtlebeachtours.com screenshot

About Website

Visit myrtlebeachtours.com now to see the best up-to-date Myrtle Beach Tours content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about myrtlebeachtours.com

Myrtle Beach is is the Southeastern leader in student group vacation packages since 1988 with over 30 years experience

Visit myrtlebeachtours.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Myrtlebeachtours.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

myrtlebeachtours.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

myrtlebeachtours.com

98 ms

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

107 ms

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

200 ms

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Myrtlebeachtours.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) belongs to the original domain Myrtlebeachtours.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 82.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Myrtlebeachtours.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Myrtle Beach Tours images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 50.0 kB

  • Original 234.0 kB
  • After minification 234.0 kB
  • After compression 184.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 51.1 kB
  • After compression 49.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myrtlebeachtours.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (61%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Myrtle Beach Tours. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

myrtlebeachtours.com

myrtlebeachtours.com

98 ms

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

107 ms

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

www.myrtlebeachtours.com

200 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

67 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

92 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

118 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

121 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

125 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

121 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

123 ms

rrssb.css

rrssb.css

126 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

131 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

133 ms

styles.css

styles.css

140 ms

js

js

94 ms

js

js

301 ms

5e6dc0a0-6fd4-013a-523f-06abc14c0bc6

5e6dc0a0-6fd4-013a-523f-06abc14c0bc6

37 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

197 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.4.1.min.js

136 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

217 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

193 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

192 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js

193 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

212 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

297 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

295 ms

rrssb.min.js

rrssb.min.js

337 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

335 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

333 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

336 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

355 ms

api.js

api.js

61 ms

global.js

global.js

361 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

186 ms

js

js

353 ms

all.js

all.js

303 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

303 ms

logo.png

logo.png

185 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

183 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

185 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

183 ms

icon-instagram.png

icon-instagram.png

329 ms

icon-tumblr.png

icon-tumblr.png

325 ms

gold-overlay.png

gold-overlay.png

359 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

416 ms

banner-1r.jpg

banner-1r.jpg

416 ms

banner-1g.jpg

banner-1g.jpg

414 ms

banner-1b.jpg

banner-1b.jpg

416 ms

bg-welcome.jpg

bg-welcome.jpg

346 ms

lambchops.jpg

lambchops.jpg

412 ms

SpringBreak.jpg

SpringBreak.jpg

430 ms

31A0EB71-155D-0010-07FC57D7FE0B033Dcollege.jpg

31A0EB71-155D-0010-07FC57D7FE0B033Dcollege.jpg

494 ms

house6.jpg

house6.jpg

608 ms

bg-signups.jpg

bg-signups.jpg

539 ms

worksans-regular-webfont.woff

worksans-regular-webfont.woff

491 ms

worksans-medium-webfont.woff

worksans-medium-webfont.woff

491 ms

worksans-light-webfont.woff

worksans-light-webfont.woff

490 ms

worksans-semibold-webfont.woff

worksans-semibold-webfont.woff

535 ms

worksans-bold-webfont.woff

worksans-bold-webfont.woff

535 ms

worksans-black-webfont.woff

worksans-black-webfont.woff

532 ms

Lato-Regular.woff

Lato-Regular.woff

407 ms

Lato-Bold.woff

Lato-Bold.woff

472 ms

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

oswald-bold-webfont.woff

473 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

472 ms

oswald-light-webfont.woff

oswald-light-webfont.woff

471 ms

Lato-LightItalic.woff

Lato-LightItalic.woff

471 ms

Lato-Italic.woff

Lato-Italic.woff

477 ms

montserrat-regular-webfont.woff

montserrat-regular-webfont.woff

457 ms

montserrat-semibold-webfont.woff

montserrat-semibold-webfont.woff

454 ms

montserrat-light-webfont.woff

montserrat-light-webfont.woff

452 ms

montserrat-ultralight-webfont.woff

montserrat-ultralight-webfont.woff

450 ms

hotjar-2273817.js

hotjar-2273817.js

238 ms

montserrat-hairline-webfont.woff

montserrat-hairline-webfont.woff

431 ms

montserrat-bold-webfont.woff

montserrat-bold-webfont.woff

479 ms

montserrat-extrabold-webfont.woff

montserrat-extrabold-webfont.woff

479 ms

montserrat-black-webfont.woff

montserrat-black-webfont.woff

479 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

384 ms

collect

collect

104 ms

collect

collect

96 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

107 ms

all.js

all.js

36 ms

collect

collect

191 ms

modules.01a02f6e8b126e8c8358.js

modules.01a02f6e8b126e8c8358.js

127 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

110 ms

Accessibility Review

myrtlebeachtours.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

myrtlebeachtours.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

myrtlebeachtours.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myrtlebeachtours.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Myrtlebeachtours.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

myrtlebeachtours.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Myrtle Beach Tours. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: