2.8 sec in total
85 ms
2.3 sec
404 ms
Click here to check amazing Mystic Stamp content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mysticstamp.com
Buying and Selling U.S. and worldwide postage stamps for stamp collectors.
Visit mysticstamp.comWe analyzed Mysticstamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
mysticstamp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value26.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value4,070 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.043
99/100
15%
Value27.3 s
0/100
10%
85 ms
81 ms
319 ms
115 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Mysticstamp.com, 32% (25 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Mysticstampcom.matomo.cloud.
Page size can be reduced by 203.8 kB (11%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Mysticstamp.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 879.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mystic Stamp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mysticstamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (59%)
74
30
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mystic Stamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mysticstamp.com
85 ms
mysticstamp.com
81 ms
www.mysticstamp.com
319 ms
theme-bundle.polyfills.js
115 ms
theme-bundle.head_async.js
102 ms
theme-9b46e800-eb60-013c-a5d4-0a330d28b389.css
85 ms
google_analytics4-713b0679de97617cc4e76fe4e93785e694e91683.js
102 ms
otSDKStub.js
102 ms
sharethis.js
71 ms
lo.js
74 ms
matomo.js
156 ms
e907bf99eef4fb286e50f9235551fcc2.js
100 ms
index.js
156 ms
jquery.min.js
70 ms
embed.js
267 ms
theme-bundle.main.js
105 ms
datatags-b0cffa9d082a6a7d67818f35604c03cfa484e996.js
97 ms
csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js
270 ms
visitor_stencil.js
110 ms
embed.js
73 ms
collector.js
73 ms
analytics-c7af4d4e323cc1137c45f692e81cae05fd2a3986.js
167 ms
e42fdda3-516d-4a73-97a9-f2dba74d05b3.json
162 ms
gtm.js
231 ms
_dmptv4.js
220 ms
lo.legacy.js
96 ms
matomo.php
1132 ms
logo_1658661253__71259.original.png
121 ms
untitled-1__56793.original.jpg
120 ms
us%20stamps%20by%20scott%20%23__59567.original.jpg
120 ms
rare__07614.original.jpg
121 ms
year%20and%20decade__58491.original.jpg
120 ms
airmails__82799.original.jpg
121 ms
albums__05246.original.jpg
130 ms
mounts__86600.original.jpg
130 ms
supplements__35663.original.jpg
129 ms
usa-es150__18786.original.jpg
129 ms
europe__23654.original.jpg
129 ms
great%20britain__14015.original.jpg
129 ms
canada__35488.original.jpg
214 ms
topical__58119.original.jpg
209 ms
2024-free-catalog-graphic-for-the-homepage.jpg
214 ms
mystic-album-cover.jpg
214 ms
configs.php
595 ms
location
149 ms
4FSI-8AR
145 ms
carts
391 ms
index.php
333 ms
analytics.js
102 ms
m7w4cqx5h1
251 ms
landingpages.css
50 ms
LandingPagesEmbedded1_2
245 ms
strings.js
58 ms
nobot
73 ms
9d6b748a
51 ms
otBannerSdk.js
26 ms
linkid.js
35 ms
ec.js
28 ms
en.json
32 ms
collect
172 ms
hotjar-1368696.js
915 ms
landing
762 ms
otFlat.json
278 ms
otPcPanel.json
591 ms
otCommonStyles.css
591 ms
js
266 ms
bat.js
743 ms
widget.js
742 ms
api.min.js
740 ms
configs.php
612 ms
clarity.js
130 ms
main.js
480 ms
matomo.php
434 ms
ot_close.svg
360 ms
ot_company_logo.png
277 ms
landing
312 ms
modules.1a30a0a67c3c23c13060.js
140 ms
c.gif
48 ms
mysticstamp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mysticstamp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mysticstamp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mysticstamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mysticstamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mysticstamp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mystic Stamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: