Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

profile.corp.mulesoft.com

MuleSoft | Automate anything. Empower everyone.

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

profile.corp.mulesoft.com screenshot

About Website

Visit profile.corp.mulesoft.com now to see the best up-to-date Profile Corp Mule Soft content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profile.corp.mulesoft.com

MuleSoft provides the easy-to-use tools you need to automate your way to higher productivity and lower costs. Equip any team to automate with clicks or code.

Visit profile.corp.mulesoft.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Profile.corp.mulesoft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

profile.corp.mulesoft.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.mulesoft.com

183 ms

onetrust.min.css

195 ms

onetrust-mulesoft-custom.css

287 ms

css_zJKGR-7M_xelp-y1TcCDir9-i4Ei1py9B31F2U-bSvc.css

91 ms

css_TvF151ljr4cKPG484fCr5morIoSeJnPh84LdLqkxYvw.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Profile.corp.mulesoft.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Mulesoft.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.7 kB (29%)

Content Size

953.9 kB

After Optimization

676.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Profile.corp.mulesoft.com main page is 953.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 491.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 138.1 kB

  • Original 171.5 kB
  • After minification 171.5 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 491.1 kB
  • After minification 488.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profile Corp Mule Soft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 70.0 kB
  • After minification 70.0 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 88.9 kB

  • Original 221.3 kB
  • After minification 220.6 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profile.corp.mulesoft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profile Corp Mule Soft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

profile.corp.mulesoft.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

profile.corp.mulesoft.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

profile.corp.mulesoft.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profile.corp.mulesoft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profile.corp.mulesoft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Profile Corp Mule Soft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: