Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

natap.org

National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project - NATAP - HIV - AIDS Treatment Information

Page Load Speed

941 ms in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

412 ms

Page Rendered

487 ms

natap.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to natap.org homepage info - get ready to check NATAP best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about natap.org

Natap's web site is a leader in up-to-the minute HIV treatment information, covering the latest in drug development and research, comprehensive conference reports, and in-depth articles on HIV treatme...

Visit natap.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Natap.org page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 899 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natap.org performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natap.org

42 ms

natap.org

63 ms

natapbanner.htm

15 ms

natapmenu.htm

26 ms

pageone.htm

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Natap.org, 14% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.2 kB (41%)

Content Size

381.4 kB

After Optimization

223.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Natap.org main page is 381.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 308.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 25.6 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NATAP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 119.3 kB

  • Original 308.1 kB
  • After minification 308.1 kB
  • After compression 188.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.3 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 32.3 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natap.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (20%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NATAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

natap.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

natap.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

natap.org SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natap.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natap.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NATAP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: