Tools & Wizards About Us
ncg.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ncg.us

Nealberg Consulting Group is under construction

Page Load Speed

334 ms in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

228 ms

Page Rendered

91 ms

ncg.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ncg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ncg.us

Healthcare International Business expansion And Outreach

Visit ncg.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Ncg.us page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 319 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ncg.us performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ncg.us

15 ms

www.ncg.us

142 ms

css

37 ms

5tppk.css

15 ms

people.png

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Ncg.us, 29% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (142 ms) belongs to the original domain Ncg.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

163.8 kB

After Optimization

142.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ncg.us main page is 163.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 134.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 685 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 696 B, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 115.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ncg needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 136 B

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ncg.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ncg. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ncg.us

ncg.us

15 ms

www.ncg.us

www.ncg.us

142 ms

css

css

37 ms

5tppk.css

5tppk.css

15 ms

people.png

people.png

11 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

19 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

23 ms

Accessibility Review

ncg.us accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

ncg.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ncg.us SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ncg.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ncg.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ncg.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ncg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: