Tools & Wizards About Us
nightlight.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

nightlight.de

Aus Nightlight wird cruz! Jetzt die neue Seite entdecken!

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

93 ms

nightlight.de screenshot

About Website

Visit nightlight.de now to see the best up-to-date Nightlight content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nightlight.de

Nightlight hat sich verändert: neuer Name, neue Ideen, neue Produkte und neue Leute. Unser Anliegen ist aber das gleiche geblieben: Menschen sollen von Jesus erfahren!

Visit nightlight.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Nightlight.de page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nightlight.de performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nightlight.de

362 ms

1497 ms

zif1jfg.css

909 ms

uaf.css

226 ms

slick.min.css

330 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nightlight.de, 75% (79 requests) were made to Cruz42.de and 17% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cruz42.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 117.1 kB (65%)

Content Size

180.0 kB

After Optimization

63.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nightlight.de main page is 180.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 122.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 122.8 kB
  • After minification 120.8 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 57.2 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nightlight needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (92%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nightlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nightlight.de

nightlight.de

362 ms

1497 ms

zif1jfg.css

zif1jfg.css

909 ms

uaf.css

uaf.css

226 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

330 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

330 ms

imagehover.css

imagehover.css

332 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

331 ms

exad-styles.min.css

exad-styles.min.css

342 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

460 ms

style.css

style.css

438 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

551 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

439 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

440 ms

3dx.css

3dx.css

456 ms

css

css

143 ms

css

css

160 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

657 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

548 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

555 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

569 ms

post-1219.css

post-1219.css

571 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

882 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

659 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

662 ms

global.css

global.css

684 ms

post-659.css

post-659.css

686 ms

borlabs-cookie_8_de.css

borlabs-cookie_8_de.css

767 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

769 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

772 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

799 ms

css

css

162 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

804 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

876 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

893 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

878 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

914 ms

zif1jfg.css

zif1jfg.css

111 ms

spline-viewer.js

spline-viewer.js

113 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

815 ms

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

jquery.sticky-sidebar.js

903 ms

exad-scripts.min.js

exad-scripts.min.js

904 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

904 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

905 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

811 ms

blog-masonry.min.js

blog-masonry.min.js

718 ms

full-screen-mobile-menu.min.js

full-screen-mobile-menu.min.js

787 ms

header-replace-search.min.js

header-replace-search.min.js

787 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

792 ms

ow-lightbox.min.js

ow-lightbox.min.js

774 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

718 ms

ow-slider.min.js

ow-slider.min.js

716 ms

scroll-effect.min.js

scroll-effect.min.js

782 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

767 ms

select.min.js

select.min.js

758 ms

ow-infinite-scroll.min.js

ow-infinite-scroll.min.js

678 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

859 ms

gaoptout.js

gaoptout.js

712 ms

social.js

social.js

762 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

761 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

675 ms

borlabs-cookie.min.js

borlabs-cookie.min.js

680 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

726 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

758 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

761 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

677 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

679 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

733 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

728 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

748 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

684 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

681 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

672 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

733 ms

p.css

p.css

25 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

728 ms

cropped-cruz_slogan_555.png

cropped-cruz_slogan_555.png

706 ms

Cruz_Signet-Logo_web512.png

Cruz_Signet-Logo_web512.png

662 ms

nightlight.png

nightlight.png

662 ms

logo-bunt.png

logo-bunt.png

662 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWw.woff

22 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8cTfOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8cTfOLjOWw.woff

98 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8ajfOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8ajfOLjOWw.woff

38 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbfOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbfOLjOWw.woff

74 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbeOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbeOLjOWw.woff

74 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8SjYOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8SjYOLjOWw.woff

67 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWw.woff

46 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbYOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbYOLjOWw.woff

74 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8V_YOLjOWw.woff

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8V_YOLjOWw.woff

75 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

74 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

76 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

75 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

75 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

95 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

94 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

96 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

94 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

94 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

956 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

960 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

729 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

673 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

672 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

774 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

983 ms

Accessibility Review

nightlight.de accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nightlight.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nightlight.de SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nightlight.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nightlight.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nightlight.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nightlight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: